<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2013-07-25" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="6627" />
  <endPage num="6703" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Government Stationery Contract</name>
      <text id="201307253b61153ed080459c90000474">
        <heading>GOVERNMENT STATIONERY CONTRACT</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="563" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. I.F. EVANS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Davenport</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-07-25">
            <name>GOVERNMENT STATIONERY CONTRACT</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-07-25T14:34:00" />
        <text id="201307253b61153ed080459c90000475">
          <timeStamp time="2013-07-25T14:34:00" />
          <by role="member" id="563">The Hon. I.F. EVANS (Davenport) (14:34):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Finance. Following the minister's comments that the tender document in relation to the whole-of-government stationery contract explicitly stated exclusivity, can he explain what is meant by tender document A when it says, 'It can be expected that any final contract will be entered into on a non-exclusive basis'?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1808" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. M.F. O'BRIEN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Napier</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Finance</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Police</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Correctional Services</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Emergency Services</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Road Safety</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-07-25">
            <name>GOVERNMENT STATIONERY CONTRACT</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-07-25T14:35:00" />
        <text id="201307253b61153ed080459c90000476">
          <timeStamp time="2013-07-25T14:35:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1808">The Hon. M.F. O'BRIEN (Napier—Minister for Finance, Minister for Police, Minister for Correctional Services, Minister for Emergency Services, Minister for Road Safety) (14:35):</by>  What it means is that we envisage that there would be two successful tenderers so there would be no exclusivity in the final outcome. There would be two successful tenderers, hence non-exclusivity. But beyond those companies that were successful in their tender application, there would be exclusivity.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>