<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2013-07-25" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="6627" />
  <endPage num="6703" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Fringe Benefits Tax</name>
      <text id="2013072500cf31de9409435580000347">
        <heading>FRINGE BENEFITS TAX</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Norwood</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-07-25">
            <name>FRINGE BENEFITS TAX</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-07-25T14:07:00" />
        <text id="2013072500cf31de9409435580000348">
          <timeStamp time="2013-07-25T14:07:00" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Norwood—Leader of the Opposition) (14:07):</by>  My question is to the Treasurer. Has any modelling been undertaken on the cost to the state budget of the new FBT arrangements for the state government's 8,363 fleet vehicles and, if so, what is the cost?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-07-25">
            <name>FRINGE BENEFITS TAX</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-07-25T14:08:00" />
        <text id="2013072500cf31de9409435580000349">
          <timeStamp time="2013-07-25T14:08:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier, Treasurer, Minister for State Development, Minister for the Public Sector, Minister for the Arts) (14:08):</by>  I thank the honourable member for that question. Of course, our preliminary investigations and the advice we have from the commonwealth are that it would be revenue-positive for South Australia, because—</text>
        <text id="2013072500cf31de9409435580000350">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="7">Ms Chapman interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2013072500cf31de9409435580000351">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> I call the deputy leader to order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2013072500cf31de9409435580000352">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  —of the additional GST receipts that would be received through the changes to the FBT arrangements. That is something that we have asked some questions about from the commonwealth, but there is a very substantial additional benefit that is allegedly to come to South Australia as a consequence of these changes.</text>
        <text id="2013072500cf31de9409435580000353">Of course, it is our position that we want a variation to the FBT arrangements, so if our contentions were to come to bear, we would have a preference that would be given to Australian-made vehicles in respect of FBT treatment. These are the matters that we do wish to advance with the commonwealth, including any potential impact that it has on South Australia. At the moment, the advice is that it would be revenue-positive.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>