<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2013-07-24" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="6535" />
  <endPage num="6629" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Child Protection</name>
      <text id="2013072410ec987ca330489cb0000427">
        <heading>CHILD PROTECTION</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3124" kind="question">
        <name>Mr PISONI</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Unley</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-07-24">
            <name>CHILD PROTECTION</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-07-24T14:20:00" />
        <text id="2013072410ec987ca330489cb0000428">
          <timeStamp time="2013-07-24T14:20:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3124">Mr PISONI (Unley) (14:20):</by>  Supplementary question: was the undercover police source present on the bus full of children being driven interstate and was the undercover police source monitoring the alleged sex offender's activities at night?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1808" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. M.F. O'BRIEN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Napier</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Finance</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Police</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Correctional Services</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Emergency Services</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Road Safety</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-07-24">
            <name>CHILD PROTECTION</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-07-24T14:21:00" />
        <text id="2013072410ec987ca330489cb0000429">
          <timeStamp time="2013-07-24T14:21:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1808">The Hon. M.F. O'BRIEN (Napier—Minister for Finance, Minister for Police, Minister for Correctional Services, Minister for Emergency Services, Minister for Road Safety) (14:21):</by>  When I became aware of the existence of the email via the media that the member for Unley did last night, a member of my staff contacted SAPOL. At no time had SAPOL been made aware of that particular email. This morning they interviewed the individual who passed the email on to the member for Unley. We have established that the email was received on 6 July. In my calculation that makes it 18 days, not two weeks; so, the member for Unley has been sitting on this email for 18 days.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3124">
        <name>Mr PISONI</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2013072410ec987ca330489cb0000430">
          <by role="member" id="3124">Mr PISONI:</by>  Point of order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="6563" />
        <text id="2013072410ec987ca330489cb0000431">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> The Minister for Police will be seated.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3124">
        <name>Mr PISONI</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2013072410ec987ca330489cb0000432">
          <by role="member" id="3124">Mr PISONI:</by>  I refer to the substance of the question. The question was about a bus trip that happened in November last year.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2013072410ec987ca330489cb0000433">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> That appears to be another obstructive point of order, which is just used as an opportunity by the member for Unley to make an impromptu speech. Accordingly, I warn him for the first time. The Minister for Police may now continue.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1808">
        <name>The Hon. M.F. O'BRIEN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2013072410ec987ca330489cb0000434">
          <by role="member" id="1808">The Hon. M.F. O'BRIEN:</by>  SAPOL are at their initial stages of investigation. I think there are other individuals who they would like to interview, because there may be a potential breach of parole conditions that was not identified or conveyed to SAPOL, which potentially could have put young children at risk. Investigations are continuing. I think this house at some stage needs an explanation from the member for Unley as to why this information was not conveyed to SAPOL in a timely manner and, more specifically, was the Leader of the Opposition made aware?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="563" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. I.F. Evans</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2013072410ec987ca330489cb0000435">
          <by role="member" id="563">The Hon. I.F. Evans:</by>  Point of order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2013072410ec987ca330489cb0000436">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> The Minister for Police will wind up, and that should wind up the member for Davenport as well.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>