<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2013-07-24" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="6535" />
  <endPage num="6629" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Fringe Benefits Tax</name>
      <text id="20130724bd26e3b42388401180000395">
        <heading>FRINGE BENEFITS TAX</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Norwood</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-07-24">
            <name>FRINGE BENEFITS TAX</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-07-24T14:14:00" />
        <text id="20130724bd26e3b42388401180000396">
          <timeStamp time="2013-07-24T14:14:00" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Norwood—Leader of the Opposition) (14:14):</by>  My supplementary is to the Premier. Is there a communication problem between the Premier and the Prime Minister which contributed to the Prime Minister's decision to push ahead with changes to the fringe benefits tax on motor vehicles without even consulting him?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-07-24">
            <name>FRINGE BENEFITS TAX</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-07-24T14:15:00" />
        <page num="6561" />
        <text id="20130724bd26e3b42388401180000397">
          <timeStamp time="2013-07-24T14:15:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier, Treasurer, Minister for State Development, Minister for the Public Sector, Minister for the Arts) (14:15):</by>  I think there is a policy problem. The federal Labor Party made a decision which is not in the interests of South Australia, and we understand why they made that decision. They obviously were making some substantial decisions around changes to the carbon tax arrangements to move to a floating ETS scheme, and they sought to offset that with revenue measures. They sought to make those revenue errors—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Marshall</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130724bd26e3b42388401180000398">
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr Marshall:</by>  The question is: is there a communication problem between yourself and the Prime Minister?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130724bd26e3b42388401180000399">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  No, there's a policy choice problem. That's the problem. They made a choice about how they should deal with this question of the revenue they needed to provide. I have not got a difficulty with the way in which they have constructed changes to business taxation arrangements; it is entirely a matter for them. What I am interested in is the effect that it has on the car industry, and so we don't agree with the policy position they've taken. I've been prepared, though, to set aside the fact that this is the same political party at a national level.</text>
        <text id="20130724bd26e3b42388401180000400">Of course, it is not comfortable to have to oppose not only the Prime Minister of the country but also the leader of your national party, but I have done that in the interests of South Australia, and I simply invite the Leader of the Opposition to join with me in the same way. We both have an interest here. You have a leader of your party who is proposing a change which is not in South Australia's interest. I ask you to oppose that, just as we have done in relation to these FBT changes.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4338">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130724bd26e3b42388401180000401">
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL:</by>  Supplementary, sir.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130724bd26e3b42388401180000402">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> Supplementary from the Leader of the Opposition.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>