<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2013-07-23" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="6455" />
  <endPage num="6537" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Child Protection Inquiry</name>
      <page num="6482" />
      <text id="201307236f8c2709959d476780000382">
        <heading>CHILD PROTECTION INQUIRY</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Norwood</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-07-23">
            <name>CHILD PROTECTION INQUIRY</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-07-23T14:22:00" />
        <text id="201307236f8c2709959d476780000383">
          <timeStamp time="2013-07-23T14:22:00" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Norwood—Leader of the Opposition) (14:22):</by>  My supplementary is again to the Premier: given the fact that both he and the former minister for education (the member for Hartley) were the subject of the Debelle inquiry, or certainly part of that inquiry, why is it appropriate that the Premier exempt himself from the cabinet deliberations but not the former minister for education?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-07-23">
            <name>CHILD PROTECTION INQUIRY</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-07-23T14:22:00" />
        <text id="201307236f8c2709959d476780000384">
          <timeStamp time="2013-07-23T14:22:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier, Treasurer, Minister for State Development, Minister for the Public Sector, Minister for the Arts) (14:22):</by>  I didn't acknowledge that she had not exempted herself; I frankly can't remember. Secondly, it is completely irrelevant; she was not the subject of the inquiry. What was being inquired into was the fact that there were two sources of advice: some advice from the Police agency and some advice from the Education agency.</text>
        <text id="201307236f8c2709959d476780000385">That inconsistency was the matter that was being inquired into. The inquiry itself found that she had taken all appropriate steps and had not behaved in any manner that was the subject of criticism. I think those opposite need to maintain a little bit of consistency about the Debelle inquiry. Did they decide that they support the findings of the inquiry, or don't they support the findings of the inquiry. When it suits them—</text>
        <text id="201307236f8c2709959d476780000386">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="1">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201307236f8c2709959d476780000387">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  When it suits them—</text>
        <text id="201307236f8c2709959d476780000388">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="1">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201307236f8c2709959d476780000389">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  When it suits them—</text>
        <text id="201307236f8c2709959d476780000390">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="1">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201307236f8c2709959d476780000391">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> Premier, would you be seated? I warn the member for Heysen for the first time, and I warn the member for Hammond for the first time. Premier.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201307236f8c2709959d476780000392">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  Thank you, Mr Speaker. They are content to cast doubt on the findings of the inquiry, but the findings of the inquiry that I was a witness of truth, that my staff members were witnesses of truth, get no attention from those opposite, because they want to cast doubt on the essential findings. I know they are disappointed that they didn't get what they wanted out of this inquiry, so they want to have a further royal commission, so they—</text>
        <text id="201307236f8c2709959d476780000393">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="1">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201307236f8c2709959d476780000394">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  You had a finding by a royal commissioner, and it is utterly inappropriate to cast doubt on the integrity of that finding. We have never done that. We are the ones that established this inquiry. I know those opposite suggested that this was an unnecessary inquiry; we believed it was necessary, and it has provided a very strong road map for us to provide the reforms that are necessary for this system.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4338">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201307236f8c2709959d476780000395">
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL:</by>  Sir, can the Premier—as a supplementary—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201307236f8c2709959d476780000396">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> Is the leader looking for a fourth supplementary?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4338">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201307236f8c2709959d476780000397">
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL:</by>  Correct.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201307236f8c2709959d476780000398">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> No, I think you will have to await the next question. Member for Ramsay.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>