<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2013-07-23" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="6455" />
  <endPage num="6537" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Child Protection Inquiry</name>
      <text id="20130723d5c9a46026bf426d80000374">
        <heading>CHILD PROTECTION INQUIRY</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Norwood</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-07-23">
            <name>CHILD PROTECTION INQUIRY</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-07-23T14:21:00" />
        <text id="20130723d5c9a46026bf426d80000375">
          <timeStamp time="2013-07-23T14:21:00" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Norwood—Leader of the Opposition) (14:21):</by>  Was it a conflict of interest for the former education minister, the member for Hartley, not to exempt herself from cabinet deliberations in relation to the inquiry that was investigating her?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130723d5c9a46026bf426d80000376">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> Supplementary to the Premier.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2013-07-23T14:21:00" />
        <text id="20130723d5c9a46026bf426d80000377">
          <timeStamp time="2013-07-23T14:21:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier, Treasurer, Minister for State Development, Minister for the Public Sector, Minister for the Arts) (14:21):</by>  Well, it is implicit in the answer to the first question: of course, no. Indeed, the outcome of the royal commission was that the former minister for education was utterly found to be without fault in any respect—</text>
        <text id="20130723d5c9a46026bf426d80000378">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="1">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130723d5c9a46026bf426d80000379">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  Utterly without fault in any respect; not the subject of any adverse criticism. In fact, by implication, it was found that she was poorly served by an agency which put her in a very difficult position in answering public questions.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4338">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130723d5c9a46026bf426d80000380">
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL:</by>  Supplementary, sir.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130723d5c9a46026bf426d80000381">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> Before we consider a third supplementary: I call the member for Unley to order; I warn the deputy leader for the first time; and I call the member for Morialta to order, so he can enter his own name.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>