<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2013-07-03" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="6277" />
  <endPage num="6371" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Child Protection Inquiry</name>
      <text id="20130703cf8a9c731a5246bba0000478">
        <heading>CHILD PROTECTION INQUIRY</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Norwood</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-07-03">
            <name>CHILD PROTECTION INQUIRY</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-07-03T14:48:00" />
        <text id="20130703cf8a9c731a5246bba0000479">
          <timeStamp time="2013-07-03T14:48:00" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Norwood—Leader of the Opposition) (14:48):</by>  Supplementary: if this was a mistake, why did Mr Blewett file this email under a folder on his computer called 'school issues' and then never ever go back to follow it up?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-07-03">
            <name>CHILD PROTECTION INQUIRY</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-07-03T14:48:00" />
        <text id="20130703cf8a9c731a5246bba0000480">
          <timeStamp time="2013-07-03T14:48:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier, Treasurer, Minister for State Development, Minister for the Public Sector, Minister for the Arts) (14:48):</by>  I direct the member to the findings that are made by Mr Debelle. It is not a finding that is made by Mr Debelle, that there has been some other ulterior purpose in those matters. He accepts Mr Blewett as a witness of truth.</text>
        <text id="20130703cf8a9c731a5246bba0000481">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="7">Ms Chapman interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130703cf8a9c731a5246bba0000482">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  You can laugh about that, but he accepts Mr Blewett as a—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130703cf8a9c731a5246bba0000483">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> Premier, would you be seated. I warn the deputy leader for the first time. The Premier.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130703cf8a9c731a5246bba0000484">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  He accepts Mr Blewett's evidence that these are proper matters to be handled by an agency, especially an agency that employs staff with special expertise in these areas, that operational matters are a matter proper for staff, that it would be wrong for ministerial staff to meddle in the affairs, especially sensitive affairs of this sort, at the level of the school. He accepts Mr Blewett's assertion that he was entitled to assume that the matter was being properly handled. So Mr Blewett's mistake needs to be considered in that context.</text>
        <page num="6310" />
        <text id="20130703cf8a9c731a5246bba0000485">Of course, it was a mistake not handing it on to me, but you need to consider that mistake in the context of the findings that were made that he was entitled to assume the matter was being handled properly. There is no positive thing that Mr Blewett did: it was the failure to do something. He was acting on the basis of a proper assumption that Mr Debelle said he could make, that is, that the matter was being handled at the level of the school appropriately.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>