<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2013-06-20" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="6207" />
  <endPage num="6279" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Police Numbers</name>
      <text id="20130620a22d9db57bdc4481b0000515">
        <heading>POLICE NUMBERS</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4342" kind="question">
        <name>Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Stuart</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-06-20">
            <name>POLICE NUMBERS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-06-20T14:40:00" />
        <text id="20130620a22d9db57bdc4481b0000516">
          <timeStamp time="2013-06-20T14:40:00" />
          <by role="member" id="4342">Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN (Stuart) (14:40):</by>  My question is for the Minister for Police. Can the minister confirm that the number of sworn police full-time equivalents at 30 June is estimated to be 39 fewer than 12 months ago, according to documents provided to the opposition under FOI?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1808" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. M.F. O'BRIEN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Napier</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Finance</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Police</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Correctional Services</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Emergency Services</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Road Safety</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-06-20">
            <name>POLICE NUMBERS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-06-20T14:40:00" />
        <text id="20130620a22d9db57bdc4481b0000517">
          <timeStamp time="2013-06-20T14:40:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1808">The Hon. M.F. O'BRIEN (Napier—Minister for Finance, Minister for Police, Minister for Correctional Services, Minister for Emergency Services, Minister for Road Safety) (14:40):</by>  I can't confirm that figure, but I can confirm the fluidity in patterns with people going on long service leave and the like.</text>
        <text id="20130620a22d9db57bdc4481b0000518">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="1">An honourable member interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1808" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. M.F. O'BRIEN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130620a22d9db57bdc4481b0000519">
          <by role="member" id="1808">The Hon. M.F. O'BRIEN:</by>  Yes; that is largely responsible for any discrepancy. The overall trend is upwards—</text>
        <text id="20130620a22d9db57bdc4481b0000520">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="1">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1808" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. M.F. O'BRIEN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130620a22d9db57bdc4481b0000521">
          <by role="member" id="1808">The Hon. M.F. O'BRIEN:</by>  Yes, they are—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531" kind="interjection">
        <name>An honourable member</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130620a22d9db57bdc4481b0000522">
          <by role="member" id="531">An honourable member:</by>  Eight hundred more than what is in the document.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3124" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Pisoni</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130620a22d9db57bdc4481b0000523">
          <by role="member" id="3124">Mr Pisoni:</by>  What is the difference then?</text>
        <text id="20130620a22d9db57bdc4481b0000524">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="1">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1808" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. M.F. O'BRIEN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130620a22d9db57bdc4481b0000525">
          <by role="member" id="1808">The Hon. M.F. O'BRIEN:</by>  That figure can be misleading, and I quizzed it myself. The explanation as I gave it is that people go on long service leave; they are still sworn officers, but it has an impact on the number of individuals who are in place to do the required job. The overall trend is upward and, if you look, say, six months later, you will find that there has been a reversal in that particular figure.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>