<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2013-06-20" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="6207" />
  <endPage num="6279" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Employment Figures</name>
      <text id="20130620508167efe3214c2d90000379">
        <heading>EMPLOYMENT FIGURES</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Norwood</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-06-20">
            <name>EMPLOYMENT FIGURES</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-06-20T14:13:00" />
        <text id="20130620508167efe3214c2d90000380">
          <timeStamp time="2013-06-20T14:13:00" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Norwood—Leader of the Opposition) (14:13):</by>  The Premier said that he was spending $10 billion to create 8,700 jobs. Can he perhaps tell the parliament how much the state will be paying to create each of those jobs?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-06-20">
            <name>EMPLOYMENT FIGURES</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-06-20T14:13:00" />
        <text id="20130620508167efe3214c2d90000381">
          <timeStamp time="2013-06-20T14:13:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier, Treasurer, Minister for State Development, Minister for the Public Sector, Minister for the Arts) (14:13):</by>  I am more than happy to do that. It is set out in the budget, and I will repeat: $896 million upgrade of South Road between the Torrens Road intersection and the River Torrens, the construction of the electrical substation at Dry Creek, getting back on the Gawler line. I know the member—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3124">
        <name>Mr PISONI</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130620508167efe3214c2d90000382">
          <by role="member" id="3124">Mr PISONI:</by>  Point of order, sir: the Premier is not addressing the substance of the question. The question was about the cost of creating those jobs.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130620508167efe3214c2d90000383">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> I think the better point would be repetition. The leader.</text>
        <text id="20130620508167efe3214c2d90000384">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="1">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130620508167efe3214c2d90000385">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> There is more?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130620508167efe3214c2d90000386">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  Yes, Mr Speaker. I am just simply seeking to answer a question that I was asked by the Leader of the Opposition.</text>
        <text id="20130620508167efe3214c2d90000387">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="1">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130620508167efe3214c2d90000388">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> The Premier has the call.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Marshall</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130620508167efe3214c2d90000389">
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr Marshall:</by>  $1.2 million—that's how much.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130620508167efe3214c2d90000390">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  He knows the answer to the question, apparently, but he happens to be wrong. The public investments we have made—$10.1 billion of public investment that we have made—will generate not only the jobs that have been created here but economic returns and activity for generations in this state, just like the state building measures that were taken by Sir Thomas Playford when he raised debt to finance the important state building projects which have built the state—</text>
        <text id="20130620508167efe3214c2d90000391">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="7">Ms Chapman interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130620508167efe3214c2d90000392">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> The deputy leader is warned for the second time.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="6238" />
        <text id="20130620508167efe3214c2d90000393">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  —the hospitals; the schools: the public infrastructure that continues to deliver returns to South Australians now, just like any public investment. Consider this, Mr Speaker: the so-called allegation against the government of false economy when we make significant public investments which generate benefits for generations. There would not be a public investment made in this state or this nation if it was not for sensible governments making long-term investments funded by debt. Are you seriously suggesting that out of our recurrent expenditure we should fund the state building projects that allow this state to grow and prosper? That is economic lunacy. To be advanced by those opposite simply demonstrates they have no—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4342">
        <name>Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130620508167efe3214c2d90000394">
          <by role="member" id="4342">Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN:</by>  Point of order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130620508167efe3214c2d90000395">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> Point of order from the member for Stuart.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4342">
        <name>Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130620508167efe3214c2d90000396">
          <by role="member" id="4342">Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN:</by>  The Premier is entering into debate. When he says, 'Do you seriously think this' or 'Do you seriously think that,' he is entering into debate, sir.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130620508167efe3214c2d90000397">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> Well, the conjecture was around the cost per job. I think it is within the legitimate answer for the Premier to canvass the merits per job.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4343" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Gardner</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130620508167efe3214c2d90000398">
          <by role="member" id="4343">Mr Gardner:</by>  You've gone soft.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130620508167efe3214c2d90000399">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> No; well, actually, I haven't. Excuse me, Premier. The member for Morialta—and I imagine he did this a lot in school—drew my attention to the Minister for Transport Services defying my ruling by continuing to interject. In accordance with the information supplied to me by the member for Morialta, I warn the Minister for Transport Services for the first time. Premier.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130620508167efe3214c2d90000400">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  I conclude by saying that ensuring that the state has a moderate level of debt so that it can fund important public infrastructure projects, so that it can continue to deliver surpluses for people in the future and also jobs—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="549" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Venning</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130620508167efe3214c2d90000401">
          <by role="member" id="549">Mr Venning:</by>  Moderate level of debt; I'd hate to see a high one.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130620508167efe3214c2d90000402">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> I call the member for Schubert to order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130620508167efe3214c2d90000403">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  —for people now, is at the heart of our economic strategy. We accept that there is a difference of opinion—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="549" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Venning</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130620508167efe3214c2d90000404">
          <by role="member" id="549">Mr Venning:</by>  That's disgraceful!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130620508167efe3214c2d90000405">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> I warn the member for Schubert.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130620508167efe3214c2d90000406">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  —between us on this question of how the economy should be run in the interests of the ordinary working people of this state. We accept that there is a difference between us and we are content for the community of South Australia to make their choice.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>