<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2013-06-19" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="6119" />
  <endPage num="6210" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>GM Holden</name>
      <text id="201306198aec3446600b4f40b0000427">
        <heading>GM HOLDEN</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="631" kind="question">
        <name>Mr HAMILTON-SMITH</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Waite</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-06-19">
            <name>GM HOLDEN</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-06-19T14:19:00" />
        <text id="201306198aec3446600b4f40b0000428">
          <timeStamp time="2013-06-19T14:19:00" />
          <by role="member" id="631">Mr HAMILTON-SMITH (Waite) (14:19):</by>  My question is to the Premier. As he indicated yesterday that he won't lobby the Prime Minister to abolish the carbon tax because Holden has not 'raised the carbon tax as an issue of concern', will the Premier now lobby the Prime Minister to abolish that carbon tax, given that Holden has today raised the carbon tax as an issue of concern, not only for their own business directly but for their suppliers in the SME sector?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-06-19">
            <name>GM HOLDEN</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-06-19T14:20:00" />
        <text id="201306198aec3446600b4f40b0000429">
          <timeStamp time="2013-06-19T14:20:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier, Treasurer, Minister for State Development, Minister for the Public Sector, Minister for the Arts) (14:20):</by>  I don't accept the proposition that you advance. We have been in regular conversations with Holden. They have never asked me to advance a proposition with the commonwealth about the carbon tax. It was no part of our discussions which led to the agreement that we reached and it has been no part of the renegotiation since. Properly understood, Mr Devereaux's remarks are that the carbon tax, while making a contribution to their input costs is, in the scheme of things, a small proposition compared with the overall support that they are requiring from the commonwealth government in relation to the future of their operations here in this country. We need to put this in some sort of context.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1813" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mrs Redmond</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201306198aec3446600b4f40b0000430">
          <by role="member" id="1813">Mrs Redmond:</by>  Yes, we've got the context.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201306198aec3446600b4f40b0000431">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  Exactly. There is not one country in the world that manufactures cars that does not support its car manufacturing industry. They either support it directly through subsidies in the way in which the Australian government has chosen, they support it indirectly through tariffs, or they use other indirect measures through currency revaluation. All of those are particular mechanisms, and the Australian government has chosen the most transparent method, and that is subsidies, so you can see exactly what you get. An effective tariff which would be across all cars would provide a more blunt instrument for protecting industry.</text>
        <page num="6150" />
        <text id="201306198aec3446600b4f40b0000432">Subsidies allow one to achieve commitments in return for the direct subsidies that are given. That is the mechanism that the South Australian government used when it sat down with Detroit and negotiated the package of measures for the reinvestment in Holden's in South Australia. The reason that this has all been thrown in the air is that the underpinnings of our arrangement have been pulled out by the federal Coalition. Our negotiations were negotiated against a backdrop of $2 billion of commonwealth assistance—</text>
        <text id="201306198aec3446600b4f40b0000433">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="1">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201306198aec3446600b4f40b0000434">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  —that you are putting in jeopardy.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>