<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2013-06-18" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="6017" />
  <endPage num="6120" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Grievance Debate</name>
    <text id="20130618af388f8814ba4d2780000818">
      <heading>Grievance Debate</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>GM Holden</name>
      <text id="20130618af388f8814ba4d2780000819">
        <heading>GM HOLDEN</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="631" kind="speech">
        <name>Mr HAMILTON-SMITH</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Waite</electorate>
        <startTime time="2013-06-18T15:29:00" />
        <text id="20130618af388f8814ba4d2780000820">
          <timeStamp time="2013-06-18T15:29:00" />
          <by role="member" id="631">Mr HAMILTON-SMITH (Waite) (15:29):</by>  I want to respond on behalf of the opposition to today's developments at Holden, because they are very worrying for all who have a stake in the future of that company. It must be made clear in this house and to the people of South Australia that Labor's failure to adequately engage with Holden over 11 years, and in particular its failure to sign off on Holden's $275 million coinvestment last year, are the principal reasons the company faces an uncertain future today.</text>
        <text id="20130618af388f8814ba4d2780000821">They are also the reasons workers are now being asked to accept pay cuts and improve productivity measures. The state Liberals are using the budget response this week to solidly reaffirm their support for a coinvestment package for Holden and to slam Labor for its complete and total failure and inaction. Federal and state Labor have had a chance to do more over recent years and they have failed.</text>
        <text id="20130618af388f8814ba4d2780000822">Can I remind the house that this government, of which the current premier was a minister for the entire period, completely ignored manufacturing, preferring instead to talk up mining and defence. That was all we ever heard of: mining and defence. Manufacturing was categorised as some sort of a 'rust bucket' history upon which the state should no longer dwell, in the language that was used by the then premier and the then treasurer.</text>
        <text id="20130618af388f8814ba4d2780000823">We always disagreed with that argument. We always argued that manufacturing should and does have a bright future if it properly transforms, but they did not want to have a bar of it. The current premier, apparently, was silent on the subject on his side of the house, because manufacturing was ignored.</text>
        <text id="20130618af388f8814ba4d2780000824">The fact is that as far as SA investment and jobs are concerned, Holden is too important for state and federal governments to ignore. The $275 million coinvestment package, which includes $50 million from South Australia as a contribution, is essential, and it should have been locked in over a year ago when the proposal was first put to the current state Labor government. Instead they prevaricated, they delayed, they let it drag on, and now it is in hiatus, awaiting the outcome of a federal election. We should not be in that position.</text>
        <text id="20130618af388f8814ba4d2780000825">Of course, we heard the current Premier threatening Holden about that funding when they announced redundancies and other measures, and certainly stretching the matter out. We have had the absolute insult of the current Prime Minister overturning the $500 million green car innovation fund that was put in place by her predecessor, Kevin Rudd, when he was prime minister. If we still had prime minister Rudd, perhaps we would still have that $500 million fund.</text>
        <text id="20130618af388f8814ba4d2780000826">The SA Liberals will be standing right beside Holden in the years ahead and sending the same message of support for the automotive industry to anyone involved in the decision-making process. Labor's attempts to misrepresent the Coalition's position and the state Liberals' position are a complete disgrace. In response to comments made by the Premier in answer to questions today, could I just point out that the $1.5 million automotive transformation fund was put on the table when there were three carmakers.</text>
        <text id="20130618af388f8814ba4d2780000827">There are now only two carmakers, and the coalition is going forward with a $1 billion fund, which comprises more than enough money to deal with the coinvestment package required by Holden. It was the Gillard Labor government that scrapped the car innovation fund; it is the state Labor government that has failed consistently over 11 years to do enough for manufacturing, and in particular for the car industry. They just left it to its own devices and now we find ourselves in the position that we are in today. It has all happened on Labor's watch.</text>
        <page num="6069" />
        <text id="20130618af388f8814ba4d2780000828">A future Liberal state government will be completely committed to an accountable and sustainable well targeted coinvestment in Holden, and we will be relentless in our support. Prime Minister Gillard and Premier Weatherill and a raft of Labor ministers, both federal and state, have made false promises and false starts, and have delivered ruin as far as Holden is concerned.</text>
        <text id="20130618af388f8814ba4d2780000829">The companies, the workers and the union will need to work together now to work through the current issue in regard to remuneration and productivity questions. We wish them well. If we were in government we would be doing everything we could to support them. We hope that this government is doing likewise, but we have serious doubts as to whether it is. Frankly, the mess in the car industry has all happened on Labor's watch. It is their responsibility; they created the problem and they have done nothing to fix it.</text>
        <text id="20130618af388f8814ba4d2780000830">Time expired.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>