<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2013-06-05" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="5863" />
  <endPage num="5964" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Grievance Debate</name>
    <text id="20130605b5de7ad8dbed42e990001081">
      <heading>Grievance Debate</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Country Hospitals</name>
      <text id="20130605b5de7ad8dbed42e990001082">
        <heading>COUNTRY HOSPITALS</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4342" kind="speech">
        <name>Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Stuart</electorate>
        <startTime time="2013-06-05T15:05:00" />
        <text id="20130605b5de7ad8dbed42e990001083">
          <timeStamp time="2013-06-05T15:05:00" />
          <by role="member" id="4342">Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN (Stuart) (15:05):</by>  I rise today to speak about country health in South Australia. I remind the house that back in May 2008, all of regional South Australia, and in fact much of metro South Australia, was up in arms about the government's country health plan, and it had to make a significant backdown in the face of that public opinion. In February 2011, discussion was first started with the proposal of an inquiry by the Social Development Committee into country health.</text>
        <text id="20130605b5de7ad8dbed42e990001084">That was progressed in the Legislative Council by the Hon. Michelle Lensink, in her role as opposition health spokesman in that house. On 23 February, she moved a motion that the parliament's Social Development Committee inquire into country health. Through that process the former minister for health said very publicly that he would be happy to participate in that. He said he had no fear of that; in fact, he said he supported and welcomed the inquiry.</text>
        <text id="20130605b5de7ad8dbed42e990001085">He did not ever back down from that, but unfortunately it seems that the government has. In fact, former minister Hill even sat down with me and we discussed the terms of reference. We came to an agreement. He said he was very comfortable with them. He said the government was very comfortable with them; certainly the opposition was. Those terms of reference were put and agreed on 6 April in the Legislative Council and they included:</text>
        <text id="20130605b5de7ad8dbed42e990001086">
          <inserted>examine the review by the Health Performance Council on the operation of health advisory councils;</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20130605b5de7ad8dbed42e990001087">
          <inserted>inquire into and report on current provision and plans for the future delivery of health services in regional South Australia, with particular reference to health advisory councils and the benefits or otherwise of the removal of hospital boards;</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20130605b5de7ad8dbed42e990001088">
          <inserted>trends in local community fundraising for medical equipment services;</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20130605b5de7ad8dbed42e990001089">
          <inserted>how funds currently and previously raised by local communities are held and spent, with particular regard to authorisation and decision-making;</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20130605b5de7ad8dbed42e990001090">
          <inserted>timing of finalised operational budgets in country hospitals;</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20130605b5de7ad8dbed42e990001091">
          <inserted>ownership and transfer of property titles of country hospitals;</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20130605b5de7ad8dbed42e990001092">
          <inserted>South Australian ambulance service arrangements, including the role of volunteers, fees and fundraising, and the benefits or otherwise to local community events;</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20130605b5de7ad8dbed42e990001093">
          <inserted>procurement by Country Health SA and the benefits or otherwise to country communities;</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20130605b5de7ad8dbed42e990001094">
          <inserted>the benefits or otherwise of all rural and remote South Australia being classified as one local health network within the federal health system;</inserted>
        </text>
        <page num="5920" />
        <text continued="true" id="20130605b5de7ad8dbed42e990001095">And there were others. These were the things that the minister at the time and I agreed were important to look at, and the government and the opposition both agreed were important to look at, and yet the government has squibbed on this deal. Here we are today, in June 2013, and the government has still refused to let this inquiry progress. The Social Development Committee was essentially instructed by the parliament to undertake this inquiry.</text>
        <text id="20130605b5de7ad8dbed42e990001096">I have stayed in touch over recent years with the various chairs of the Social Development Committee. The most recent response I had was on 18 February, from the current chair, the Hon. Russell Wortley. In his letter, essentially what he says is, 'The terms of reference relating to regional health services remain on the committee's forward work plan.'</text>
        <text id="20130605b5de7ad8dbed42e990001097">The public is becoming very impatient about when this inquiry will actually take place, if this inquiry will actually take place. The public is very concerned about a whole range of broken commitments by this government, but the public, particularly in rural South Australia, wants this to go ahead within the term of this parliament, as the government promised that it would.</text>
        <text id="20130605b5de7ad8dbed42e990001098">Rural health service providers are doing the very best that they possibly can throughout rural and regional South Australia, but complaints keep coming in. Let me advise the house that the complaints come, as well as from the public at large, from doctors, nurses, health advisory committee members, allied health professionals—from a whole range of people who are working in the system as well as those who depend upon the system. They want the system changed and improved. The government said that it would undertake this inquiry. The current health minister, for whatever reason, has not allowed it to progress. The government has not allowed it to progress. I call on the government to progress with this inquiry. They said they would do it and it must be done.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>