<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2013-05-16" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="5717" />
  <endPage num="5796" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Prisoner Complaint, Ombudsman's Report</name>
      <text id="2013051696161fc04c664a5aa0000579">
        <heading>PRISONER COMPLAINT, OMBUDSMAN'S REPORT</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4342" kind="question">
        <name>Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Stuart</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-05-16">
            <name>PRISONER COMPLAINT, OMBUDSMAN'S REPORT</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-05-16T14:45:00" />
        <text id="2013051696161fc04c664a5aa0000580">
          <timeStamp time="2013-05-16T14:45:00" />
          <by role="member" id="4342">Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN (Stuart) (14:45):</by>  I have a supplementary. Given that the minister has just said that he thinks that the Ombudsman's report is a very fair and balanced one then, presumably, he accepts the Ombudsman saying that the government acted contrary to law. Who then should undertake an investigation into the government acting contrary to law?</text>
        <text id="2013051696161fc04c664a5aa0000581">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="1">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4342" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2013051696161fc04c664a5aa0000582">
          <by role="member" id="4342">Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN:</by>  No.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1808" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. M.F. O'BRIEN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Napier</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Finance</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Police</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Correctional Services</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Emergency Services</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Road Safety</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2013-05-16T14:45:00" />
        <page num="5756" />
        <text id="2013051696161fc04c664a5aa0000583">
          <timeStamp time="2013-05-16T14:45:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1808">The Hon. M.F. O'BRIEN (Napier—Minister for Finance, Minister for Police, Minister for Correctional Services, Minister for Emergency Services, Minister for Road Safety) (14:45):</by>  Firstly, I don't accept that assertion. Even if I were to accept that assertion, which I do not, the Ombudsman actually has done the body of work that the member for Stuart is suggesting be undertaken. It's extremely comprehensive. I don't think that any stone has been left unturned. The recommendations are expansive, and I know there is a view within Corrections that the recommendations are recommendations that we are able to act upon.</text>
        <text id="2013051696161fc04c664a5aa0000584">They are not unreasonable and, as I said, we have accepted all of the recommendations. There is one that we have had some difficulty in meeting, and that is just due to the fact that there is not a product in the market, I believe—certainly not in Australia but probably not even internationally—that would satisfy the specifications or requirements of the Ombudsman. As I said on a couple of occasions, this is obviously an issue that New South Wales is grappling with as well, and we are working with the New South Wales government ultimately, I think, to develop our own product by virtue of the fact that we don't seem to be able to secure the product in the marketplace.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>