<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2013-05-16" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="5717" />
  <endPage num="5796" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Prisoner Complaint, Ombudsman's Report</name>
      <text id="2013051699de4b5acaf54f19b0000574">
        <heading>PRISONER COMPLAINT, OMBUDSMAN'S REPORT</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4342" kind="question">
        <name>Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Stuart</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-05-16">
            <name>PRISONER COMPLAINT, OMBUDSMAN'S REPORT</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-05-16T14:42:00" />
        <text id="2013051699de4b5acaf54f19b0000575">
          <timeStamp time="2013-05-16T14:42:00" />
          <by role="member" id="4342">Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN (Stuart) (14:42):</by>  Again, my question is to the Minister for Correctional Services. Does the minister agree with the Ombudsman's report that the government acted 'contrary to law' given the manner in which Ms Davies was restrained, and if not, why not?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1808" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. M.F. O'BRIEN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Napier</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Finance</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Police</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Correctional Services</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Emergency Services</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Road Safety</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-05-16">
            <name>PRISONER COMPLAINT, OMBUDSMAN'S REPORT</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-05-16T14:42:00" />
        <text id="2013051699de4b5acaf54f19b0000576">
          <timeStamp time="2013-05-16T14:42:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1808">The Hon. M.F. O'BRIEN (Napier—Minister for Finance, Minister for Police, Minister for Correctional Services, Minister for Emergency Services, Minister for Road Safety) (14:42):</by>  I think the Ombudsman's report is quite a balanced one, and that is the view of Corrections as well. The Ombudsman has accepted the view of Corrections that the primary objective was to ensure that Ms Davies did not inflict grievous harm upon herself. The prime concern of corrections officers was to keep this woman alive. As I detailed in my ministerial statement, we have spent a considerable amount of money in seeking to attain that outcome and we spent a considerable amount of money keeping the woman under close observation while a facility was constructed at Port Augusta.</text>
        <text id="2013051699de4b5acaf54f19b0000577">I have visited the women's prison and I have seen the facility in which Ms Davies was held. I have visited Yatala and I have been into the cell in which she was held. We have made a commitment, both at Yatala and the women's prison, to upgrade the facilities, such that if we have a repetition of this type of case we will be in a position to deal with it in a more humane way than we were forced to in this particular instance. The Ombudsman has recognised that a considerable amount of money has been expended in three facilities, particularly the facility at Port Augusta, and that work will commence at the other two facilities.</text>
        <text id="2013051699de4b5acaf54f19b0000578">We have addressed all of the recommendations of the Ombudsman, bar the one in relation to restraints. As I said, we are working with the New South Wales government to develop a device, if you like, that would meet the requirements of the Ombudsman. I believe that work is now currently underway to develop that particular product, because there is not a product currently on the market that would fulfil the outcome required by the Ombudsman.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>