<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2013-05-15" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="5643" />
  <endPage num="5720" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>South Road Upgrades</name>
      <text id="2013051537cc5d2e657b413f80000425">
        <heading>SOUTH ROAD UPGRADES</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-05-15">
            <name>SOUTH ROAD UPGRADES</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-05-15T14:39:00" />
        <text id="2013051537cc5d2e657b413f80000426">
          <timeStamp time="2013-05-15T14:39:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (14:39):</by>  Given the answer, I do have a supplementary. In the event, minister, that Mr Abbott is successful at the election, will you be supporting financially the Darlington upgrade?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">West Torrens</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Transport and Infrastructure</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Mineral Resources and Energy</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Housing and Urban Development</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-05-15">
            <name>SOUTH ROAD UPGRADES</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-05-15T14:40:00" />
        <text id="2013051537cc5d2e657b413f80000427">
          <timeStamp time="2013-05-15T14:40:00" />
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS (West Torrens—Minister for Transport and Infrastructure, Minister for Mineral Resources and Energy, Minister for Housing and Urban Development) (14:40):</by>  I have made it very clear and the government has made it very clear that as to the proposal by the Coalition to upgrade Darlington, they provided $500 million and are requiring a co-contribution from the state government of $250 million. On conservative advice from the department, that is short by $250 million. Now, even if we had contributed the half a billion dollars required to match their half a billion to do the project properly—</text>
        <text id="2013051537cc5d2e657b413f80000428">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="1">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2013051537cc5d2e657b413f80000429">
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS:</by>  Pay attention.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2013051537cc5d2e657b413f80000430">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> Minister, would you be seated? I warn the deputy leader for the second and final time, and I call the member for Waite to order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2013051537cc5d2e657b413f80000431">
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS:</by>  He took one for the team, sir. I don't think it was actually him.</text>
        <text id="2013051537cc5d2e657b413f80000432">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="1">An honourable member interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2013051537cc5d2e657b413f80000433">
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS:</by>  No, a dobber would be me naming you, but you are so irrelevant it doesn't matter. Given that the Coalition's policies to upgrade Darlington without any public transport or rail overpass and the department's advice to do it properly would be $1.8 billion, I think it is fair to say unless they stumped up another $1.3 billion, we wouldn't be doing it.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>