<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2013-05-14" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="5575" />
  <endPage num="5644" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>GM Holden</name>
      <text id="201305146c96d08680004b20a0000539">
        <heading>GM HOLDEN</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="631" kind="question">
        <name>Mr HAMILTON-SMITH</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Waite</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-05-14">
            <name>GM HOLDEN</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-05-14T15:08:00" />
        <text id="201305146c96d08680004b20a0000540">
          <timeStamp time="2013-05-14T15:08:00" />
          <by role="member" id="631">Mr HAMILTON-SMITH (Waite) (15:08):</by>  Supplementary question, again to the Premier. Given his answer, is he confident that the agreement will result in a minimum jobs guarantee and the retention of Holden in Adelaide and, in particular, will the agreement go to the parliament's Industry Development Committee before it is signed off?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-05-14">
            <name>GM HOLDEN</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-05-14T15:09:00" />
        <text id="201305146c96d08680004b20a0000541">
          <timeStamp time="2013-05-14T15:09:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier, Treasurer, Minister for State Development, Minister for the Public Sector, Minister for the Arts) (15:09):</by>  I thank the honourable member for his question. We already have a minimum jobs guarantee; that is the nature of the agreement we reached with Holden. What has occurred, in our view, is a breach. How that breach will be remedied is something that's the subject of negotiation, so I can't tell the house where that ultimately will land except to say that at the front of our mind we will be wanting to secure the $1 billion worth of investment from Holden to make sure that there is a future, remembering that what this does is secure Holden between 2016 in 2022 in a way which allows us to transition a car manufacturing industry—a vital industry for the future of our state.</text>
        <text id="201305146c96d08680004b20a0000542">We've been very open about the fact that it will be a smaller industry but, hopefully, a more secure one because we will have found a place for Holden in the global car manufacturing world. That's the work that has to occur over these next 10 or so years. In relation to the second part of the shadow minister's question, we'll do better than taking it to a committee of parliament: we'll bring it to the parliament, just as we did with the original arrangement. That's appropriate for an issue of this significance.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>