<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2013-05-14" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="5575" />
  <endPage num="5644" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>GM Holden</name>
      <text id="20130514cd576221321e463090000533">
        <heading>GM HOLDEN</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="631" kind="question">
        <name>Mr HAMILTON-SMITH</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Waite</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-05-14">
            <name>GM HOLDEN</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-05-14T15:06:00" />
        <text id="20130514cd576221321e463090000534">
          <timeStamp time="2013-05-14T15:06:00" />
          <by role="member" id="631">Mr HAMILTON-SMITH (Waite) (15:06):</by>  My question is to the Premier. Has the government signed the promised co-investment agreement with Holden and the commonwealth and, if so, what are the terms and obligations on all the parties?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-05-14">
            <name>GM HOLDEN</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-05-14T15:06:00" />
        <page num="5611" />
        <text id="20130514cd576221321e463090000535">
          <timeStamp time="2013-05-14T15:06:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier, Treasurer, Minister for State Development, Minister for the Public Sector, Minister for the Arts) (15:06):</by>  I thank the honourable member for his question. The nature of the agreement we have with General Motors Holden is the one that is evidenced by the exchange in correspondence. What has happened since that time? That agreement also contemplated a further more detailed agreement about precisely what would happen during this period between 2016 to 2022. It is that later funding agreement that is still the subject of negotiation and, because of the nature of events that have occurred—the announcement of the 400 jobs to be lost in South Australia—that is the subject of renegotiations.</text>
        <text id="20130514cd576221321e463090000536">I have had a number of meetings and discussions with Mr Devereux, but those matters are not yet concluded. They are being advanced in parallel with discussions about the fate of these 400 workers, ensuring that they are indeed voluntary redundancies and not forced redundancies. That has been our principal focus, because that is the more immediate issue coming to fruition at the end of July, so those things are being advanced in parallel.</text>
        <text id="20130514cd576221321e463090000537">It is worth saying though that some of the benefits in the agreement have also been acted upon, so some of the matters that were agreed between the state government and General Motors Holden have already been acted upon. For instance, those component suppliers that have been identified as long-term prospects for working in Holden's global supply chains have been identified and work is going on with them to ensure that they are able to reach or be sustained at a standard which will allow them to continue to be part of Holden's ongoing global supply chain.</text>
        <text id="20130514cd576221321e463090000538">They have travelled with Holden representatives to a number of other countries where there are home rooms that provide the various, if you like, hubs for component suppliers and ordering of the global vehicles that Holden will be manufacturing. So the agreement is being part performed, but elements of it now require renegotiation because of the nature of the decision Holden has taken.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>