<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2013-05-14" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="5575" />
  <endPage num="5644" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Desalination Plant</name>
      <text id="201305145eab43f70c6943c8a0000451">
        <heading>DESALINATION PLANT</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-05-14">
            <name>DESALINATION PLANT</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-05-14T14:49:00" />
        <page num="5606" />
        <text id="201305145eab43f70c6943c8a0000452">
          <timeStamp time="2013-05-14T14:49:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (14:49):</by>  My supplementary to the Premier is: why then, Premier, are you allowing your government to increase the take from the River Murray over the next few years?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-05-14">
            <name>DESALINATION PLANT</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-05-14T14:50:00" />
        <text id="201305145eab43f70c6943c8a0000453">
          <timeStamp time="2013-05-14T14:50:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier, Treasurer, Minister for State Development, Minister for the Public Sector, Minister for the Arts) (14:50):</by>  This is the difficulty when shadow ministers comment outside of their area of expertise. We are not increasing the take on the River Murray over the next few years. Not only are we not increasing it, we are decreasing the amount that we are taking from the River Murray.</text>
        <text id="201305145eab43f70c6943c8a0000454">The first thing is that water licences are fixed, and the only thing that's going to happen to those water licences is that they are going to go down. We are putting six gigalitres of our existing licence back into the river—that is the first point—and we are also accumulating an environmental reserve over a period of time, which will also underpin the long-term security of the River Murray.</text>
        <text id="201305145eab43f70c6943c8a0000455">So, in two important respects we are reducing the take on the River Murray, quite apart from not increasing our take on the River Murray, as the growth in our population and the growth in our industrial demands would otherwise have required. This is the point that those opposite fail to appreciate: not only are they wrong—just simply wrong—about increasing our take, they also fail to take into account that we have ambitions to grow the state, but we want to grow this state sustainably in a way that does not put pressure on our precious natural resources.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>