<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2013-05-14" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="5575" />
  <endPage num="5644" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>South Road Upgrades</name>
      <text id="20130514ec7127acdb744a92b0000418">
        <heading>SOUTH ROAD UPGRADES</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="563" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. I.F. EVANS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Davenport</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-05-14">
            <name>SOUTH ROAD UPGRADES</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-05-14T14:39:00" />
        <text id="20130514ec7127acdb744a92b0000419">
          <timeStamp time="2013-05-14T14:39:00" />
          <by role="member" id="563">The Hon. I.F. EVANS (Davenport) (14:39):</by>  Following the Premier's comments about the billion-dollar upgrade of that section of South Road on which the federal government has made an announcement today, can the Treasurer or Premier confirm that there is a GST clawback as a result of that announcement? Can he advise me the level of the clawback and confirm that that clawback will yield into the forward estimates of the budget?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-05-14">
            <name>SOUTH ROAD UPGRADES</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-05-14T14:40:00" />
        <text id="20130514ec7127acdb744a92b0000420">
          <timeStamp time="2013-05-14T14:40:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier, Treasurer, Minister for State Development, Minister for the Public Sector, Minister for the Arts) (14:40):</by>  I thank the honourable member for his question. The advice that we have is that we have received a level of road infrastructure funding which is consistent with our national population share and, therefore, there is no negative GST effect. This is something that would have an effect on the state only if we received above our national entitlement, and our advice is that that is not the case.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>