<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2013-05-02" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="5383" />
  <endPage num="5578" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Bills</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Magistrates (Miscellaneous) Amendment Bill</name>
      <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000684">
        <heading>MAGISTRATES (MISCELLANEOUS) AMENDMENT BILL</heading>
      </text>
      <subproceeding>
        <name>Introduction and First Reading</name>
        <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000685">
          <heading>Introduction and First Reading</heading>
        </text>
        <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="speech">
          <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
          <house>House of Assembly</house>
          <electorate id="">Enfield</electorate>
          <portfolios>
            <portfolio id="">
              <name>Deputy Premier</name>
            </portfolio>
            <portfolio id="">
              <name>Attorney-General</name>
            </portfolio>
            <portfolio id="">
              <name>Minister for Planning</name>
            </portfolio>
            <portfolio id="">
              <name>Minister for Industrial Relations</name>
            </portfolio>
            <portfolio id="">
              <name>Minister for Business Services and Consumers</name>
            </portfolio>
          </portfolios>
          <startTime time="2013-05-02T15:37:00" />
          <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000686">
            <timeStamp time="2013-05-02T15:37:00" />
            <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU (Enfield—Deputy Premier, Attorney-General, Minister for Planning, Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister for Business Services and Consumers) (15:37):</by>  Obtained leave and introduced a bill for an act to amend the Magistrates Act 1983; and to make related amendments to the Coroners Act 2003; the Evidence Act 1929; the Fair Work Act 1994; and the Remuneration Act 1990. Read a first time.</text>
        </talker>
      </subproceeding>
      <subproceeding>
        <name>Second Reading</name>
        <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000687">
          <heading>Second Reading</heading>
        </text>
        <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="speech">
          <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
          <house>House of Assembly</house>
          <electorate id="">Enfield</electorate>
          <portfolios>
            <portfolio id="">
              <name>Deputy Premier</name>
            </portfolio>
            <portfolio id="">
              <name>Attorney-General</name>
            </portfolio>
            <portfolio id="">
              <name>Minister for Planning</name>
            </portfolio>
            <portfolio id="">
              <name>Minister for Industrial Relations</name>
            </portfolio>
            <portfolio id="">
              <name>Minister for Business Services and Consumers</name>
            </portfolio>
          </portfolios>
          <startTime time="2013-05-02T15:39:00" />
          <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000688">
            <timeStamp time="2013-05-02T15:39:00" />
            <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU (Enfield—Deputy Premier, Attorney-General, Minister for Planning, Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister for Business Services and Consumers) (15:39):</by>  I move:</text>
          <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000689">
            <inserted>That this bill be now read a second time.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text continued="true" id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000690">This is a bill to amend the Magistrates Act 1983 and various other associated amendments. The bill modernises the magistrates act in a number of ways and introduces changes designed to improve public confidence in and understanding of the judicial system. I seek leave to have the remainder of the second reading explanation inserted in <term>Hansard </term>without my reading it.</text>
          <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000691">Leave granted.</text>
          <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000692">
            <inserted>In modernising the Act, the Bill firstly removes the term 'stipendiary' wherever it appears with 'magistrate'. The title of 'stipendiary magistrate' merely indicates that the magistrate is a paid magistrate. It is an antiquated term, not understood by many in the public nor used any longer in other jurisdictions. The Bill abolishes the administrative positions of 'Supervising Magistrate' and 'Assisting Supervising Magistrate'. These positions were originally intended to provide for the day to day management of a magistrates court. Given the jurisdictional shifts and consequent changes in workload, the positions are now superfluous.</inserted>
          </text>
          <page num="5434" />
          <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000693">
            <inserted>Instead, the direction and delegation provisions within the Act are sufficient to provide the Chief Magistrate with a flexible approach in respect of the delegation of administrative tasks for the appropriate management of the Magistrates Court. Also, consistent with the <term>District Court Act 1991</term>, the Bill places responsibility for the administration of the magistracy solely on the Chief Magistrate, removing the qualification 'subject to the control and direction of the Chief Justice' from section 7 and, reflecting current practice, modifies section 5 to require the Attorney-General to consult with the Chief Magistrate (in addition to the current requirement to consult the Chief Justice) on all new appointments to the magistracy.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000694">
            <inserted>In line with government policy of attracting the best candidate to leadership positions within the judiciary, the Bill also amends the eligibility requirements of the Chief and Deputy Chief Magistrates. Currently, the Act requires that a person already be a magistrate to be eligible for appointment as Chief or Deputy Chief Magistrate. The Bill removes this requirement and inserts that a person have at least 7 years practice as a legal practitioner, enabling a person outside of the magistracy to be appointed to the positions, effectively widening the pool of candidates and expertise.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000695">
            <inserted>Finally, the Bill amends provisions relating to the removal of magistrates, including the grounds for removal of a magistrate. Current procedure for removal of a magistrate involves an investigation and then judicial inquiry in order to determine whether proper cause exists for removal. Currently, section 11(8) provides that proper cause for removal exists if:</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000696">
            <inserted>(a)&amp;#x9;the magistrate is mentally or physically incapable of carrying out satisfactorily the duties of his office; or</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000697">
            <inserted>(b)&amp;#x9;the magistrate is convicted of an indictable offence; or</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000698">
            <inserted>(c)&amp;#x9;the magistrate is incompetent, or guilty of neglect of duty; or</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000699">
            <inserted>(d)&amp;#x9;the magistrate is guilty of unlawful or improper conduct in the performance of the duties of his office.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text continued="true" id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000700">
            <inserted>Improper conduct that occurs outside the performance of duties as a magistrate can raise questions about the suitability of a magistrate to continue in public office and undermine authority as a magistrate. Importantly, it can affect the public's confidence in how a magistrate will perform the duties of the position.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000701">
            <inserted>The Bill amends section 11(8) of the Magistrates Act to include 'conduct that renders the magistrate unfit to hold office as a magistrate, regardless of whether that conduct relates to the functions of the office.' This amendment will allow for the removal of a magistrate for improper conduct of a serious nature outside the duties of office without the need for a conviction for an indictable offence.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000702">
            <inserted>Further to this, the Bill also incorporates a new provision which allows the Attorney-General, with the approval of the Chief Justice, to require a magistrate being investigated pursuant to section 11, to undergo one or more medical examinations for the purpose of assisting in determining whether proper cause exists for removing the magistrate from office. In the event a magistrate fails to comply with the request, a statement as to the refusal may be included in any report prepared in relation to the investigation and, in turn, taken into consideration when determining whether proper cause exists.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000703">
            <inserted>This amendment is a necessary and appropriate measure, addressing potential performance management concerns, particularly in light of the recent increase in the retirement age. The amendment does not alter the investigation and removal process currently established in the Magistrates Act. Such a request to undergo medical examination will form part of the inquiry process already established under section 11. However, it does provide an appropriate measure to be utilised in a situation where confidence in a magistrate's capability to perform the duties is being questioned.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000704">
            <inserted>I commend this Bill to Members.</inserted>
          </text>
          <bookmark>Explanation of Clauses</bookmark>
          <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000705">
            <inserted>
              <subheading>Explanation of Clauses</subheading>
            </inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000706">
            <item>
              <inserted>Part 1—Preliminary</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000707">
            <item>
              <inserted>1—Short title</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000708">
            <item>
              <inserted>2—Commencement</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000709">
            <item>
              <inserted>3—Amendment provisions</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000710">
            <inserted>These clauses are formal.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000711">
            <item>
              <inserted>Part 2—Amendment of <term>Magistrates Act 1983</term></inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000712">
            <item>
              <inserted>4—Amendment of section 3—Interpretation</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000713">
            <inserted>The amendments in this clause relate to the definitions that apply under the Act. Specifically, the amendments in this clause substitute the definition of stipendiary magistrate with magistrate and substitute references to stipendiary magistrate with magistrate in the definitions generally. This is consistent with substituting all outdated references to stipendiary magistrate with references to magistrate in the Act.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text continued="true" id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000714">
            <inserted>5—Repeal of section 4</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000715">
            <inserted>This clause repeals section 4 of the Act. Section 4 of the Act provides for transitional arrangements in relation to the position of a magistrate which are no longer required.</inserted>
          </text>
          <page num="5435" />
          <text continued="true" id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000716">
            <inserted>6—Amendment of section 5—Appointment of magistrates</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000717">
            <inserted>This clause deletes subsection (2), which provides for the appointment of stipendiary magistrates.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000718">
            <inserted>Amendments to subsection (4)(b) provide that the Chief Magistrate must be consulted by the Attorney-General before a recommendation for the appointment of a magistrate is made, whether or not the appointment is to be on a part-time basis.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text continued="true" id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000719">
            <inserted>7—Substitution of section 6</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000720">
            <inserted>6—Magistracy</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000721">
            <item sublevel="2">
              <inserted>The substituted section 6 provides for the appointment of a Chief Magistrate and a Deputy Magistrate by the Governor on the recommendation of the Attorney-General and removes the capacity to appoint Supervising Magistrates and Assistant Supervising Magistrates.</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000722">
            <item sublevel="2">
              <inserted>Proposed subsection (2) provides that a person is not eligible for appointment as the Chief Magistrate or Deputy Chief Magistrate unless he or she is a legal practitioner of at least 7 years standing.</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000723">
            <item sublevel="2">
              <inserted>The proposed section departs from the existing section by no longer making reference to stipendiary magistrate and, consequently, removing the eligibility requirement that a person be a stipendiary magistrate before an appointment as the Chief Magistrate or Deputy Chief Magistrate can be made. Rather, the Deputy Chief Magistrate will be taken to have been appointed as a magistrate if he or she does not already hold that position. (A similar provision will apply in relation to the Chief Magistrate on the commencement of section 19B of the <term>Statutes Amendment (Courts Efficiency Reforms) Act 2012</term>).</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text continued="true" id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000724">
            <inserted>8—Amendment of section 7—Administration of magistracy</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000725">
            <inserted>Subclause (1) removes the requirement in subsection (1) of the principal Act that the Chief Magistrate's responsibility for the administration of the magistracy be subject to the control and direction of the Chief Justice.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000726">
            <inserted>Subclause (2) substitutes subsection (3) of the principal Act to make changes consistent with the Statute Law Revision process undertaken for the purpose of the measure.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text continued="true" id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000727">
            <inserted>9—Substitution of section 8</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000728">
            <inserted>8—Magistrates responsible to Chief Magistrate</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000729">
            <item sublevel="2">
              <inserted>Proposed section 8 departs from the existing section 8 by removing the reference to a stipendiary magistrate or an acting magistrate from subsection (1) and by not replicating existing subsection (2).</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text continued="true" id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000730">
            <inserted>10—Substitution of section 9 </inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000731">
            <inserted>9—Tenure of office</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000732">
            <item sublevel="2">
              <inserted>Most of the amendments contained in new section 9 are of a statute law revision nature but departs from the existing section by raising the retirement age of a magistrate to 70 years (from 65).</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text continued="true" id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000733">
            <inserted>11—Amendment of section 10—Suspension from office</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000734">
            <inserted>This amendment is consequential on the removal of references to stipendiary magistrate.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text continued="true" id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000735">
            <inserted>12—Substitution of section 11</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000736">
            <inserted>This clause inserts an additional ground for the removal of a magistrate from office. Proposed paragraph (e) provides that proper cause for removing a magistrate from office exists if the magistrate is guilty of conduct that renders the magistrate unfit to hold office as a magistrate, regardless of whether that conduct relates to the functions of the office.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000737">
            <inserted>11—Removal of magistrate from office</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000738">
            <item sublevel="2">
              <inserted>New section 11 provides that an investigation to determine whether proper cause exists for removing a magistrate from office—</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000739">
            <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">
              <inserted>may be conducted by the Attorney-General on the Attorney-General's own motion; and</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000740">
            <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">
              <inserted>must be conducted by the Attorney-General at the request of the Chief Justice (made after consultation with the Chief Magistrate).</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000741">
            <item sublevel="1">
              <inserted>The new section sets out the procedure for any such investigation, including the ability to require a magistrate to undergo medical examinations for the purpose.</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000742">
            <item sublevel="2">
              <inserted>As in the current section, the Attorney-General must apply to the Full Court for a determination of whether the magistrate should be removed from office if a magistrate is convicted of an indictable offence or it appears from the findings of a judicial inquiry under this section that proper cause exists for removing a magistrate from office and, if the Full Court determines that a magistrate should be removed from office, the Governor may do so.</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000743">
            <item sublevel="2">
              <inserted>The section provides for an additional proper cause for removing a magistrate from office if the magistrate is guilty of conduct that renders the magistrate unfit to hold office as a magistrate, regardless of whether that conduct relates to the functions of the office.</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text continued="true" id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000744">
            <inserted>13—Amendment of section 13—Remuneration of magistrates</inserted>
          </text>
          <page num="5436" />
          <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000745">
            <inserted>This amendment is consequential on the removal of the positions of Supervising Magistrates, Assistant Supervising Magistrates and the Senior Magistrates.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000746">
            <inserted>Further consequential amendments are made by this clause to remove a reference to stipendiary from section 13.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000747">
            <item>
              <inserted>14—Amendment of section 14—Superannuation</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000748">
            <item>
              <inserted>15—Amendment of section 15—Recreation leave</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000749">
            <item>
              <inserted>16—Amendment of section 16—Sick leave</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000750">
            <item>
              <inserted>17—Amendment of section 17—Long service leave</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000751">
            <item>
              <inserted>18—Amendment of section 18—Special leave</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000752">
            <item>
              <inserted>19—Amendment of section 18A—Concurrent appointments and outside employment etc</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000753">
            <item>
              <inserted>20—Amendment of section 19—Determination of rights on transition from other employment</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000754">
            <inserted>The amendments proposed by these clauses will remove references to 'stipendiary' from the sections and make other changes consistent with the statute law revision process undertaken in respect of the principal Act.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text continued="true" id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000755">
            <inserted>21—Substitution of section 20 </inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000756">
            <inserted>20—Payment of monetary equivalent of leave to personal representative etc</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000757">
            <item sublevel="2">
              <inserted>Proposed section 20 is substantively the same as the existing section 20 in the principal Act. The changes made reflect the removal of references to 'stipendiary' and other changes consistent with the statute law revision process.</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text continued="true" id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000758">
            <inserted>22—Amendment of section 21—Industrial awards not to affect magistrates</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000759">
            <inserted>This clause removes a reference to 'stipendiary' from section 21 of the principal Act.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text continued="true" id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000760">
            <inserted>Schedule 1—Related amendments</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000761">
            <inserted>Schedule 2 makes related amendments to other Acts relating to the amendments proposed to the <term>Magistrates Act 1983</term>.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text continued="true" id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000762">
            <inserted>Schedule 2—Statute law revision amendments of <term>Magistrates Act 1983</term></inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000763">
            <inserted>Schedule 2 makes amendments to the principal Act to convert various outdated references and to make other technical changes to accommodate current drafting practices.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="201305026081c0e4287347e480000764">Debate adjourned on motion of Mr Pengilly.</text>
        </talker>
      </subproceeding>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>