<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2013-05-02" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="5383" />
  <endPage num="5578" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>National Disability Insurance Scheme</name>
      <text id="20130502efb316aa7bc347bea0000454">
        <heading>NATIONAL DISABILITY INSURANCE SCHEME</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-05-02">
            <name>NATIONAL DISABILITY INSURANCE SCHEME</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-05-02T14:31:00" />
        <text id="20130502efb316aa7bc347bea0000455">
          <timeStamp time="2013-05-02T14:31:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (14:31):</by>  Supplementary: is the minister then saying that this error on his part was some kind of miscommunication between the two departments?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130502efb316aa7bc347bea0000456">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON:</by>  Point of order: the first question contained—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130502efb316aa7bc347bea0000457">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> Comment.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130502efb316aa7bc347bea0000458">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON:</by>  —assumption; this one contains the argument that it was the error of the member.</text>
        <text id="20130502efb316aa7bc347bea0000459">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="1">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130502efb316aa7bc347bea0000460">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON:</by>  He said it was miscommunication.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130502efb316aa7bc347bea0000461">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> I will rule against the member for Elder. I'll allow the question to go forward, and I will leave it to the minister. The Minister for Disabilities.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3123" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. A. PICCOLO</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Light</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Communities and Social Inclusion</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Social Housing</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Disabilities</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Youth</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Volunteers</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2013-05-02T14:32:00" />
        <text id="20130502efb316aa7bc347bea0000462">
          <timeStamp time="2013-05-02T14:32:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3123">The Hon. A. PICCOLO (Light—Minister for Communities and Social Inclusion, Minister for Social Housing, Minister for Disabilities, Minister for Youth, Minister for Volunteers) (14:32):</by>  I will reiterate: I can confirm that the agreement was signed. I can confirm that 33,000 South Australians will benefit from the scheme. I can confirm I have received no questions from the opposition, and neither have I been asked for a briefing on the scheme by the opposition.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130502efb316aa7bc347bea0000463">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN:</by>  Point of order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130502efb316aa7bc347bea0000464">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> What is the point of order, member for Bragg?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130502efb316aa7bc347bea0000465">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN:</by>  It is clearly a repeat of his previous answer in relation to information which I have not sought.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130502efb316aa7bc347bea0000466">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> So your question is: was there miscommunication?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130502efb316aa7bc347bea0000467">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN:</by>  What was the nature of this miscommunication? That is his explanation for why he got it wrong, so we will need to know what happened.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130502efb316aa7bc347bea0000468">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> Minister, I'll listen carefully to the answer.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3123">
        <name>The Hon. A. PICCOLO</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130502efb316aa7bc347bea0000469">
          <by role="member" id="3123">The Hon. A. PICCOLO:</by>  Mr Speaker, as I said previously—and perhaps the opposition would like to listen—I did say there was miscommunication. That miscommunication happened in my office, and I accept responsibility as minister.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>