<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2013-05-02" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="5383" />
  <endPage num="5578" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Child Protection</name>
      <text id="20130502687cee3ed8a34bd2b0000414">
        <heading>CHILD PROTECTION</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3124" kind="question">
        <name>Mr PISONI</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Unley</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-05-02">
            <name>CHILD PROTECTION</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-05-02T14:21:00" />
        <text id="20130502687cee3ed8a34bd2b0000415">
          <timeStamp time="2013-05-02T14:21:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3124">Mr PISONI (Unley) (14:21):</by>  My question is again to the Attorney-General. What advice has the government sought in relation to the lifting of a blanket suppression order for the identity of the alleged offender at the centre of the Debelle inquiry to be disclosed?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Enfield</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Business Services and Consumers</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-05-02">
            <name>CHILD PROTECTION</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-05-02T14:22:00" />
        <page num="5415" />
        <text id="20130502687cee3ed8a34bd2b0000416">
          <timeStamp time="2013-05-02T14:22:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU (Enfield—Deputy Premier, Attorney-General, Minister for Planning, Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister for Business Services and Consumers) (14:22):</by>  As I think I've already indicated, first of all, I don't consider it to be my role or, indeed, the role of any Attorney to be going around making applications one way or another in respect of suppression orders; point No. 1. Point No. 2: what happens in respect of suppression orders now, as a result of changes made by this parliament in the last six months or so, is pretty clear. There is an opportunity for anybody, including the member for Unley, to go to the court and say, 'Look, I think it's in the public interest for the name of this individual to be released.'</text>
        <text id="20130502687cee3ed8a34bd2b0000417">The court would then balance up issues like, for example, whether it would tend to identify a child victim or whether it would in any way prejudice or contaminate a police investigation. There is a whole range of things they might consider and, at the end of that, the court would make the decision.</text>
        <text id="20130502687cee3ed8a34bd2b0000418">I have not asked for advice about the matter because the parliament, as recently as the last six months, has made it very clear how you do it, and I, as I've indicated before, have no intention personally of becoming involved in that matter. I would prefer to leave the matter to the courts and the police, because it is the courts and the police that are charged by our community with dealing with questions of justice and questions of publication of details of alleged offenders.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>