<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2013-04-30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="5197" />
  <endPage num="5268" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Car Parking Levy</name>
      <text id="2013043015ff0fd394a74189b0000401">
        <heading>CAR PARKING LEVY</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Norwood</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-04-30">
            <name>CAR PARKING LEVY</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-04-30T14:46:00" />
        <text id="2013043015ff0fd394a74189b0000402">
          <timeStamp time="2013-04-30T14:46:00" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Norwood—Leader of the Opposition) (14:46):</by>  What about if I just ask this question of the Premier: given that cabinet had previously rejected the Sustainable Budget Commission's car park proposal, and you were a member of that cabinet, when did you form the opinion that the car park tax was necessary for South Australia?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2013043015ff0fd394a74189b0000403">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> That question is premised on the assumption that cabinet did reject it—which they may have done—but I don't know. Premier, do you have any reaction to that?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2013-04-30T14:46:00" />
        <text id="2013043015ff0fd394a74189b0000404">
          <timeStamp time="2013-04-30T14:46:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier, Treasurer, Minister for State Development, Minister for the Public Sector, Minister for the Arts) (14:46):</by>  Perhaps, just to help those opposite. There is a range of things that didn't even make, necessarily, the budget or cabinet process so I think we can—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531" kind="interjection">
        <name>An honourable member</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2013043015ff0fd394a74189b0000405">
          <by role="member" id="531">An honourable member:</by>  Sometimes they fall away before cabinet.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="5225" />
        <text id="2013043015ff0fd394a74189b0000406">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  Exactly. There are processes that may lead to something not even arriving at cabinet, so let's just put that to one side. The point we make is that the circumstances we find ourselves in now drive the need for the introduction of this particular set of arrangements. We have had literally billions of dollars wiped from our revenue from the combined effects of state-owned sources and GST revenue. There is only one response to that if you want to maintain public services and that is to find alternative revenue sources. If you are trying to run a prudent budget you can—</text>
        <text id="2013043015ff0fd394a74189b0000407">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="74">Mr Marshall interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2013043015ff0fd394a74189b0000408">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> I call the Leader of the Opposition to order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2013043015ff0fd394a74189b0000409">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  As, of course, we have. Once you make all the prudent decisions about reducing the level of government expenditure you can (very substantial reductions in government spending in a range of areas that we regard as a lower area of priority); once you have excluded that and once you have come to a point where you are at a prudent level of borrowings and you don't want to breach any particular cap in relation to your borrowings, the only other source of capacity to maintain public services is to raise revenue.</text>
        <text id="2013043015ff0fd394a74189b0000410">We chose this particular initiative because it had some other secondary benefits. It will assist us in driving other behaviours, such as people choosing public transport. We think it is a sensible measure. We are fortified in that view because the other major cities have also chosen this course. Indeed, just a few days ago, Victoria announced that it was going to increase its levy. So much were they persuaded by its efficacy that they have decided to increase it—so it is a sensible measure. I understand that the Liberal Party has to team up with its mates in big business; it's natural. I don't think anybody should be surprised.</text>
        <text id="2013043015ff0fd394a74189b0000411">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="1">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2013043015ff0fd394a74189b0000412">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> What about the leader asking a question?</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>