<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2013-04-11" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="5127" />
  <endPage num="5198" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Planning Laws</name>
      <text id="20130411ef718ced7ca045bc80000553">
        <heading>PLANNING LAWS</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-04-11">
            <name>PLANNING LAWS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-04-11T14:46:00" />
        <text id="20130411ef718ced7ca045bc80000554">
          <timeStamp time="2013-04-11T14:46:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (14:46):</by>  I have a supplementary question. In light of the legislation coming into effect today, Attorney, would you please confirm if you are proceeding with the regulations to allow planners to be private certifiers, in addition to building surveyors, without professional indemnity insurance and without similar qualifications to building surveyors, as I wrote to you about earlier in the week?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Enfield</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Business Services and Consumers</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-04-11">
            <name>PLANNING LAWS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-04-11T14:46:00" />
        <text id="20130411ef718ced7ca045bc80000555">
          <timeStamp time="2013-04-11T14:46:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU (Enfield—Deputy Premier, Attorney-General, Minister for Planning, Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister for Business Services and Consumers) (14:46):</by>  Yes, I have in front of me a letter from the member for Bragg, dated 9 April this year, which indicates that she had, on that day, met with the Australian Institute of Building Surveyors and they had raised a couple of matters with her. I have asked questions of my department and have been advised that the regulations are apparently—this is my advice—well accepted by the industry, and that that includes these people.</text>
        <text id="20130411ef718ced7ca045bc80000556">As to the question about professional indemnity insurance, that assertion has been made by the deputy leader. I don't believe that is the case, but I am happy to take that up. As for the question about planners, I have to say that there are some people who run this line about planners not being appropriate people to conduct certifications.</text>
        <text id="20130411ef718ced7ca045bc80000557">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="7">Ms Chapman interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130411ef718ced7ca045bc80000558">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> I call—</text>
        <text id="20130411ef718ced7ca045bc80000559">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="1">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130411ef718ced7ca045bc80000560">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> Oh, dear! I shall give—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4343" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Gardner</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130411ef718ced7ca045bc80000561">
          <by role="member" id="4343">Mr Gardner:</by>  It was Flinders.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130411ef718ced7ca045bc80000562">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> It was Flinders, was it? I'll accept the assurance of the member for Morialta that the feminine voice I heard interjecting was the member for Flinders and, accordingly, I warn him for the first time. The Deputy Premier.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130411ef718ced7ca045bc80000563">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  It may have been the member for Kavel, Mr Speaker—he is quite a ventriloquist. Anyway, back to my answer, I understand the insurance point and I'm sure we'll be able to resolve that to the satisfaction of the member for Bragg. We need to not lose sight, however, of the fact that some people who have resisted this reform need to be aware of the fact that, in local councils, the people who are performing this task are not necessarily and, in fact, are generally not planners.</text>
        <text id="20130411ef718ced7ca045bc80000564">So, we really do need to understand the real environment in which these reforms are taking place. I have the honourable member's letter. I am advised that there is acceptance of the regulations by the industry generally and, in particular, the people on whose behalf she wrote to me. However, I am pursuing the question of indemnity insurance and will advise her in due course.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>