<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2013-04-11" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="5127" />
  <endPage num="5198" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Operation Disarm</name>
      <text id="2013041123c38994528a446790000483">
        <heading>OPERATION DISARM</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4342" kind="question">
        <name>Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Stuart</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-04-11">
            <name>OPERATION DISARM</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-04-11T14:26:00" />
        <text id="2013041123c38994528a446790000484">
          <timeStamp time="2013-04-11T14:26:00" />
          <by role="member" id="4342">Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN (Stuart) (14:26):</by>  My supplementary question is: given that the Attorney-General has not disputed the figures that I gave, is he asserting, then, that somehow the rules have changed, that the safety of police entering homes to seize illegal firearms, or make reports or—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2013041123c38994528a446790000485">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> Yes, we've got the question. The Attorney-General.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Enfield</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Business Services and Consumers</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2013-04-11T14:27:00" />
        <text id="2013041123c38994528a446790000486">
          <timeStamp time="2013-04-11T14:27:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU (Enfield—Deputy Premier, Attorney-General, Minister for Planning, Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister for Business Services and Consumers) (14:27):</by>  Mr Speaker, I did not agree or disagree with the honourable member's figures because I do not know where he got them from—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="614" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. J.M. Rankine</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2013041123c38994528a446790000487">
          <by role="member" id="614">The Hon. J.M. Rankine:</by>  David Pisoni.</text>
        <text id="2013041123c38994528a446790000488">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="1">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2013041123c38994528a446790000489">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  It wouldn't be the first time in this house where numbers of variable veracity have been used as part and parcel of the question, although I accuse the honourable member of nothing in that regard. I do not know where his sources come from. I do know that I spoke to the Deputy Commissioner of Police about an hour ago, and he told me that the effect of this campaign has been to double—double—the amount of reported information from the public, through Crime Stoppers, about illegal weapons, and he regards this as a great success for SAPOL, and they are looking forward to more.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2013041123c38994528a446790000490">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> I heard the Minister for Education's insulting remark to the member for Unley, and I call her to order, and I also warn the deputy leader for the first time. The Leader of the Opposition.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>