<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2013-04-09" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4989" />
  <endPage num="5064" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>GM Holden</name>
      <text id="201304097b89f459286c4e7680000466">
        <heading>GM HOLDEN</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Norwood</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-04-09">
            <name>GM HOLDEN</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-04-09T14:51:00" />
        <text id="201304097b89f459286c4e7680000467">
          <timeStamp time="2013-04-09T14:51:00" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Norwood—Leader of the Opposition) (14:51):</by>  If the Premier has finished, I would like to ask a supplementary. He said, 'What more does the Liberal Party need in South Australia?' We repeatedly asked for this to be dealt with in a bipartisan way by the Industry Development Committee. Will the Premier commit to running any further package through the IDC so that we can deal with this in a bipartisan way?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201304097b89f459286c4e7680000468">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> We finally did get to a question there; congratulations, Leader of the Opposition. The Premier.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2013-04-09T14:52:00" />
        <text id="201304097b89f459286c4e7680000469">
          <timeStamp time="2013-04-09T14:52:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier, Treasurer, Minister for State Development, Minister for the Public Sector, Minister for the Arts) (14:52):</by>  This is a new definition of bipartisanship: offering the hand of friendship and then snidely attacking the government at every opportunity to undermine the nature of this relationship.</text>
        <text id="201304097b89f459286c4e7680000470">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="1">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201304097b89f459286c4e7680000471">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  Well, you raised bipartisanship.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3124">
        <name>Mr PISONI</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201304097b89f459286c4e7680000472">
          <by role="member" id="3124">Mr PISONI:</by>  Point of order: this is imputing improper motives on others in the parliament.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201304097b89f459286c4e7680000473">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> Well, actually, member for Unley, it isn't imputing improper motives; it may be something else that offends standing orders, but imputing improper motives is not it. The Premier is answering the question in the spirit that it was asked. Premier.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201304097b89f459286c4e7680000474">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  Thank you, Mr Speaker. We did better than allowing a committee of the parliament to analyse this arrangement. We did better than a committee of the parliament—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="563" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. I.F. Evans</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201304097b89f459286c4e7680000475">
          <by role="member" id="563">The Hon. I.F. Evans:</by>  No you didn't.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201304097b89f459286c4e7680000476">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  We let the whole parliament analyse the arrangement. We didn't—</text>
        <text id="201304097b89f459286c4e7680000477">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="1">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201304097b89f459286c4e7680000478">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  We didn't settle for a committee of the parliament: we actually committed the whole parliament to look at this matter, and—</text>
        <text id="201304097b89f459286c4e7680000479">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="1">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="5027" />
        <text id="201304097b89f459286c4e7680000480">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  —that, of course—</text>
        <text id="201304097b89f459286c4e7680000481">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="1">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201304097b89f459286c4e7680000482">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  I am sure one thing we won't get before the end of question time is one single positive idea to advance the interest of those Holden's workers.</text>
        <text id="201304097b89f459286c4e7680000483">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="1">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="563">
        <name>The Hon. I.F. EVANS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201304097b89f459286c4e7680000484">
          <by role="member" id="563">The Hon. I.F. EVANS:</by>  Supplementary question, Mr Speaker.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201304097b89f459286c4e7680000485">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> Since the last question was almost entirely a statement, I am really interested in what this supplementary will be.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>