<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2013-04-09" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4989" />
  <endPage num="5064" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>GM Holden</name>
      <text id="2013040926a21b71d1ec449e90000375">
        <heading>GM HOLDEN</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Norwood</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-04-09">
            <name>GM HOLDEN</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-04-09T14:27:00" />
        <text id="2013040926a21b71d1ec449e90000376">
          <timeStamp time="2013-04-09T14:27:00" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Norwood—Leader of the Opposition) (14:27):</by>  The Premier has just outlined to the house all of these great things that were going to flow from this agreement that he negotiated. Given it was such a great agreement, why did he actually not get around to signing it?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2013040926a21b71d1ec449e90000377">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> Yes, I think that is a supplementary. The Premier.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2013-04-09T14:27:00" />
        <text id="2013040926a21b71d1ec449e90000378">
          <timeStamp time="2013-04-09T14:27:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier, Treasurer, Minister for State Development, Minister for the Public Sector, Minister for the Arts) (14:27):</by>  The agreement is evidenced by an exchange of correspondence—</text>
        <text id="2013040926a21b71d1ec449e90000379">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="1">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2013040926a21b71d1ec449e90000380">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  —both of which were signed. It is orthodox—</text>
        <text id="2013040926a21b71d1ec449e90000381">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="1">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2013040926a21b71d1ec449e90000382">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> I warn the member for Morphett for the first time. I call the member for Unley to order. Premier.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2013040926a21b71d1ec449e90000383">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  It is orthodox for agreements to evidenced by an exchange of letters, both signed by both parties. This is orthodox. It is also orthodox for there to be later more detailed implementation agreements, which in fact happened in relation to the Cruze model, and I am advised that it took over 12 months to negotiate the final detailed arrangements in relation to that implementation agreement.</text>
        <text id="2013040926a21b71d1ec449e90000384">Look, there is an air of unreality about this. General Motors stood up in Canberra along with the Prime Minister and myself and said they were going to spend $1 billion and that the Detroit boardroom had signed off on the expenditure of $1 billion. Are you seriously suggesting that they did that without reaching an agreement with the South Australian government, the Victorian government and the commonwealth government?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="563" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. I.F. Evans</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2013040926a21b71d1ec449e90000385">
          <by role="member" id="563">The Hon. I.F. Evans:</by>  So Victoria does have an agreement.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2013040926a21b71d1ec449e90000386">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> I call the member for Davenport to order. The member for Mitchell.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>