<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2013-03-21" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4911" />
  <endPage num="4990" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Special Investigations Unit</name>
      <text id="20130321888effa79aad433ab0000439">
        <heading>SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS UNIT</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3124" kind="question">
        <name>Mr PISONI</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Unley</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-03-21">
            <name>SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS UNIT</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-03-21T14:41:00" />
        <text id="20130321888effa79aad433ab0000440">
          <timeStamp time="2013-03-21T14:41:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3124">Mr PISONI (Unley) (14:41):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Education and Child Development. Is the reason for increasing the capacity of the Special Investigations Unit, as indicated in her ministerial statement this afternoon, because of a backlog of serious employee misconduct reports or is it because of an increase in such reports?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="614" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.M. RANKINE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Wright</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Education and Child Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Multicultural Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-03-21">
            <name>SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS UNIT</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-03-21T14:41:00" />
        <text id="20130321888effa79aad433ab0000441">
          <timeStamp time="2013-03-21T14:41:00" />
          <by role="member" id="614">The Hon. J.M. RANKINE (Wright—Minister for Education and Child Development, Minister for Multicultural Affairs) (14:41):</by>  I thank the member for Unley for this question. The reason for increasing the number of people in the Special Investigations Unit is to ensure that we have timely and thorough investigations. Interestingly, the member for Unley has been out quoting that there is a backlog of 50 investigations in the unit currently—well, actually, he did not say 'currently'; I do not think he was able to tell the media currently the numbers. But can I advise the house that, in 2012, there were 51 ongoing investigations that were listed for that year—</text>
        <text id="20130321888effa79aad433ab0000442">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="1">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="614" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.M. RANKINE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130321888effa79aad433ab0000443">
          <by role="member" id="614">The Hon. J.M. RANKINE:</by>  Yes, 51—35 of those were new investigations and 24 of those were closed during the year. It is important to put this in context. We have 22,800 teachers. In 2008, there were 70. So this is a reduction of 27 per cent compared to 2008; 2012 is the lowest number of investigations since 2008.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>