<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2013-03-07" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4695" />
  <endPage num="4754" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Mount Barker Development</name>
      <text id="2013030767b305c709564bafb0000495">
        <heading>MOUNT BARKER DEVELOPMENT</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1805" kind="question">
        <name>Mr GOLDSWORTHY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Kavel</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-03-07">
            <name>MOUNT BARKER DEVELOPMENT</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-03-07T14:43:00" />
        <text id="2013030767b305c709564bafb0000496">
          <timeStamp time="2013-03-07T14:43:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1805">Mr GOLDSWORTHY (Kavel) (14:43):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Planning. Will the $2 million integrated transport and land use strategy take into consideration the growth in Mount Barker, given the significant transport problems associated with the expanding population in that area?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Enfield</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Business Services and Consumers</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-03-07">
            <name>MOUNT BARKER DEVELOPMENT</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-03-07T14:44:00" />
        <text id="2013030767b305c709564bafb0000497">
          <timeStamp time="2013-03-07T14:44:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU (Enfield—Deputy Premier, Attorney-General, Minister for Planning, Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister for Business Services and Consumers) (14:44):</by>  I thank the honourable member for that question. Yes; the idea of this is to actually coordinate land use changes, land use development, transport requirements and transport planning and, yes, of course, to the extent that we are dealing with changes in the land use pattern at Mount Barker, amongst other places, it will be necessary for us to consider the future transport requirements of that area, and that will be something that will be part of the process.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>