<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2013-03-06" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4607" />
  <endPage num="4697" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Police Funding</name>
      <text id="2013030600edfecfe4f9457b80000451">
        <heading>POLICE FUNDING</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4342" kind="question">
        <name>Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Stuart</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-03-06">
            <name>POLICE FUNDING</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-03-06T14:55:00" />
        <text id="2013030600edfecfe4f9457b80000452">
          <timeStamp time="2013-03-06T14:55:00" />
          <by role="member" id="4342">Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN (Stuart) (14:55):</by>  My question is for the Premier, again. Will the Premier confirm that he will not be supporting the cabinet submission that was leaked to the media for funding to recruit 25 extra police, given his prior comments that police have to 'manage within the budget they've been given'?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-03-06">
            <name>POLICE FUNDING</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-03-06T14:56:00" />
        <text id="2013030600edfecfe4f9457b80000453">
          <timeStamp time="2013-03-06T14:56:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier, Treasurer, Minister for State Development, Minister for the Public Sector, Minister for the Arts) (14:56):</by>  If the honourable member had followed the chain of reasoning of the previous answer, he would probably reach the conclusion that I will not actually be answering that question publicly because that would be to breach my own edict. I will not be offering an opinion about the fate or otherwise of any budget process, but can I say this: we have an incredibly well-resourced police force. We have more operational police per capita than any other state in the nation and it is no surprise that we have seen a reduction in crime in this state in the order of 40 per cent because of the excellent work of that police force.</text>
        <text id="2013030600edfecfe4f9457b80000454">We have asked the police to engage in a savings task. It is the lightest of almost any government agency, in recognition of the fact that they are a priority, but it is also true that it is the case that we can achieve sensible economies in the way in which we run any business within government. We expect police to do the same, although we will work with them to make sure that we can achieve the twin aims of being the most efficient police force as well as the police force that is able to deliver the highest standards of excellence, which it has become known for.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>