<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2013-03-05" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4539" />
  <endPage num="4610" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Child Protection</name>
      <text id="201303051e56acba63fd478290000608">
        <heading>CHILD PROTECTION</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3124" kind="question">
        <name>Mr PISONI</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Unley</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-03-05">
            <name>CHILD PROTECTION</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-03-05T15:02:00" />
        <page num="4581" />
        <text id="201303051e56acba63fd478290000609">
          <timeStamp time="2013-03-05T15:02:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3124">Mr PISONI (Unley) (15:02):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Education and Child Development. Why did it take three months for her department to inform the Catholic and independent schools that the teacher who was arrested last Thursday for the rape of a 10 year old and the production of child pornography offences was being investigated for serious child protection offences when a memorandum of understanding between the sectors requires notification as soon as the education department becomes aware?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="614" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.M. RANKINE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Wright</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Education and Child Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Multicultural Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-03-05">
            <name>CHILD PROTECTION</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-03-05T15:03:00" />
        <text id="201303051e56acba63fd478290000610">
          <timeStamp time="2013-03-05T15:03:00" />
          <by role="member" id="614">The Hon. J.M. RANKINE (Wright—Minister for Education and Child Development, Minister for Multicultural Affairs) (15:03):</by>  First and foremost, what I will do is check the assertions made by the member for Unley because—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3124">
        <name>Mr PISONI</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201303051e56acba63fd478290000611">
          <by role="member" id="3124">Mr PISONI:</by>  Point of order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201303051e56acba63fd478290000612">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> I hope this is—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3124">
        <name>Mr PISONI</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201303051e56acba63fd478290000613">
          <by role="member" id="3124">Mr PISONI:</by>  You cannot impute improper motives on other members of the chamber.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201303051e56acba63fd478290000614">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> Strictly, member for Unley, you should go out under the sessional order, but I will give you one last warning. That was not a point of order and no improper motives were imputed to you. Incompetence may have been imputed but not improper motives. Minister.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="614">
        <name>The Hon. J.M. RANKINE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201303051e56acba63fd478290000615">
          <by role="member" id="614">The Hon. J.M. RANKINE:</by>  Thank you, sir. I just think it's prudent of me to check the assertions and claims being made by the member for Unley. We have heard in this place the misrepresentation of charges that have been laid against people, so I think it is—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201303051e56acba63fd478290000616">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN:</by>  Point of order: now the minister is clearly imputing the motive and, in fact, reflecting on the member adversely on the basis—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201303051e56acba63fd478290000617">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> What are the words?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201303051e56acba63fd478290000618">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN:</by>  Clearly 'misrepresenting' to start with.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201303051e56acba63fd478290000619">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> We say about each other that we are misrepresenting all the time. What is out of order is the allegation that we are misrepresenting deliberately. Has the minister finished?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="614">
        <name>The Hon. J.M. RANKINE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201303051e56acba63fd478290000620">
          <by role="member" id="614">The Hon. J.M. RANKINE:</by>  No, sir, I have not finished. It is only under this government that we have had protocols to inform the other school sectors about incidents that involve people who are employed in the education sector. It is under this government that child protection has been given a high priority. It is under this government that massive injections of funding have gone into child protection, in employing social workers, improving accommodation, improving outcomes for children under guardianship and passing legislation that provided greater protection for children.</text>
        <text id="201303051e56acba63fd478290000621">I will also point out to the member for Unley that, in this particular case, I am very limited about what information I can provide, at the direct instruction of the South Australia Police. One of the things that they were very clear about in correspondence to my office was that they stipulated that no child from the school community is at risk.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>