<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2013-03-05" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4539" />
  <endPage num="4610" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Member for Elder</name>
      <text id="2013030516d792b5eb8e486880000483">
        <heading>MEMBER FOR ELDER</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Norwood</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-03-05">
            <name>MEMBER FOR ELDER</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-03-05T14:28:00" />
        <page num="4572" />
        <text id="2013030516d792b5eb8e486880000484">
          <timeStamp time="2013-03-05T14:28:00" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Norwood—Leader of the Opposition) (14:28):</by>  My question is again to the Premier. Following revelations that the member for Elder is working three days a week for a law firm, how will the Premier ensure that members of his cabinet do not discuss with the member for Elder matters relating to their portfolios that may present a conflict of interest for the government?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-03-05">
            <name>MEMBER FOR ELDER</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-03-05T14:28:00" />
        <text id="2013030516d792b5eb8e486880000485">
          <timeStamp time="2013-03-05T14:28:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier, Treasurer, Minister for State Development, Minister for the Public Sector, Minister for the Arts) (14:28):</by>  I thank the honourable member for his question. One of the difficulties that I think exists in the public debate is the way in which those opposite, including the Leader of the Opposition, spread misinformation about these matters.</text>
        <text id="2013030516d792b5eb8e486880000486">The Leader of the Opposition has taken the Ministerial Code of Conduct—a document which is on the public record—and read clause 7 and misinterpreted it. It is absolutely clear, on its face, that they are cumulative obligations, to actually involve—that you are precluded from dealing with somebody with whom you have direct dealings. You have simply misread the document, and that, I think, is—</text>
        <text id="2013030516d792b5eb8e486880000487">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="7">Ms Chapman interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2013030516d792b5eb8e486880000488">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  And he can turn next to him and get some expert legal advice any time he likes. I am sure—she is always prepared to proffer advice, and I am sure she will proffer advice to the Leader of the Opposition and tell him where he has got it wrong.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3124">
        <name>Mr PISONI</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2013030516d792b5eb8e486880000489">
          <by role="member" id="3124">Mr PISONI:</by>  Point of order, sir.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2013030516d792b5eb8e486880000490">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> Point of order, member for Unley.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3124">
        <name>Mr PISONI</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2013030516d792b5eb8e486880000491">
          <by role="member" id="3124">Mr PISONI:</by>  You have made it very clear that speakers must address members of this house by the electorate which they represent or the position which they hold, and I believe that the—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2013030516d792b5eb8e486880000492">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> That doesn't preclude the use of the personal pronoun and, accordingly, I call you to order. Premier.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2013030516d792b5eb8e486880000493">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  Nice try; wrong again. Look, of course the way in which the code works is to preclude ministers providing information in relation to their duties, and there is a confidentiality clause that the minister has chosen to give an undertaking that he will comply with. I expect him to comply with that. The particular terms of those arrangements have been brought to the attention of the law firm in question, and I expect them to comply and assist him in complying with that code.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>