<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2013-02-20" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4405" />
  <endPage num="4472" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Breast Screening</name>
      <text id="20130220462b8f7f6f484d9890000505">
        <heading>BREAST SCREENING</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1807" kind="question">
        <name>Dr McFETRIDGE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Morphett</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-02-20">
            <name>BREAST SCREENING</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-02-20T15:03:00" />
        <page num="4441" />
        <text id="20130220462b8f7f6f484d9890000506">
          <timeStamp time="2013-02-20T15:03:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1807">Dr McFETRIDGE (Morphett) (15:03):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Health. Following the discovery of diagnostic errors in the breast screening process, is the minister aware of how many women have been diagnosed with breast cancer who were undiagnosed in their initial scans?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.J. SNELLING</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Playford</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health and Ageing</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Defence Industries</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Veterans' Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-02-20">
            <name>BREAST SCREENING</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-02-20T15:03:00" />
        <text id="20130220462b8f7f6f484d9890000507">
          <timeStamp time="2013-02-20T15:03:00" />
          <by role="member" id="627">The Hon. J.J. SNELLING (Playford—Minister for Health and Ageing, Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse, Minister for Defence Industries, Minister for Veterans' Affairs) (15:03):</by>  I do not have those numbers to hand, but it was always the case—and the previous minister for health made it quite clear at the time—that when you are going back through the 50,000-odd scans, it was always the case that it was expected that there would be women who would need to go back for further testing who had not been asked to go back for further testing before. My advice from the department is that the numbers of women who are having to be contacted to go back for further testing is consistent with what was expected at the beginning of this process.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>