<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2013-02-20" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4405" />
  <endPage num="4472" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Child Protection</name>
      <text id="2013022053a9d69a76ff4a89a0000481">
        <heading>CHILD PROTECTION</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3124" kind="question">
        <name>Mr PISONI</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Unley</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-02-20">
            <name>CHILD PROTECTION</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-02-20T14:54:00" />
        <text id="2013022053a9d69a76ff4a89a0000482">
          <timeStamp time="2013-02-20T14:54:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3124">Mr PISONI (Unley) (14:54):</by>  My question is to Minister for Education and Child Development. Has the minister sought guarantees that there are no other instances where employment screening processes for education department staff have failed, allowing sex offenders to work with children?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="614" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.M. RANKINE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Wright</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Education and Child Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Multicultural Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-02-20">
            <name>CHILD PROTECTION</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-02-20T14:54:00" />
        <page num="4439" />
        <text id="2013022053a9d69a76ff4a89a0000483">
          <timeStamp time="2013-02-20T14:54:00" />
          <by role="member" id="614">The Hon. J.M. RANKINE (Wright—Minister for Education and Child Development, Minister for Multicultural Affairs) (14:54):</by>  As I understand it, once this particular situation came to the attention of the Department for Communities and Social Inclusion an audit was undertaken of the process. I understand there were no systemic issues that were identified as part of that audit. If the member for Unley is asking me can I guarantee that there will be no situations in the future with anyone working with children, working in this department or any other department, of course I cannot give that guarantee. What I can say is that we have a very rigorous screening process. Unfortunately, it appears on this occasion what could have been done, what perhaps should have been done, may not have been done.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>