<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2013-02-20" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4405" />
  <endPage num="4472" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Manufacturing Sector</name>
      <text id="20130220ec430cba635645ea80000376">
        <heading>MANUFACTURING SECTOR</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Norwood</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-02-20">
            <name>MANUFACTURING SECTOR</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-02-20T14:23:00" />
        <text id="20130220ec430cba635645ea80000377">
          <timeStamp time="2013-02-20T14:23:00" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Norwood—Leader of the Opposition) (14:23):</by>  Supplementary, Mr Speaker.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130220ec430cba635645ea80000378">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> If indeed it is a supplementary.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4338">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130220ec430cba635645ea80000379">
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL:</by>  I will let you be the judge of that, sir. Given the Premier's answer that manufacturing and innovation was a key priority from day one of his premiership, can the Premier tell the house why he has reduced the budget for the government's manufacturing and innovation program funding by 20 per cent since he became the Premier?</text>
        <text id="20130220ec430cba635645ea80000380">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="1">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130220ec430cba635645ea80000381">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> Yes, you don't need to justify the substance of the question; I am just trying to work out whether it is a supplementary, and I rule that it is. The Premier.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2013-02-20T14:24:00" />
        <page num="4432" />
        <text id="20130220ec430cba635645ea80000382">
          <timeStamp time="2013-02-20T14:24:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier, Treasurer, Minister for State Development, Minister for the Public Sector, Minister for the Arts) (14:24):</by>  Thank you, Mr Speaker, and I really do thank the Leader of the Opposition for giving me an opportunity to explain to him how every section of the government is now being turned towards this objective. Those opposite have the curious view that somehow, because there is one agency that might have a name that might include something to do with manufacturing or a program concerning manufacturing, that represents the whole of the effort that the government makes in that particular field. To actually demonstrate the absurdity of that proposition—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4343" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Gardner</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130220ec430cba635645ea80000383">
          <by role="member" id="4343">Mr Gardner:</by>  You pointed to the sub-program which you cut its funding.</text>
        <text id="20130220ec430cba635645ea80000384">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="51">Mrs Redmond interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130220ec430cba635645ea80000385">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  —one only needs to look at the investments that we're making in the defence sector.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130220ec430cba635645ea80000386">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> Premier, would you be seated for a minute. I haven't had an opportunity to issue warnings, and I'll now take the opportunity to call the member for Heysen to order and to warn the member for Morialta for the first time. Premier.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130220ec430cba635645ea80000387">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  One example that demonstrates the lack of understanding of those opposite about the way in which government works in this space is the investment that the state government made in Rosebank Engineering in collaboration with BAE Systems down at Edinburgh Parks in a new titanium processing plant down there. Now, that was to permit them to participate in that important international global supply chain, the joint strike fighter, an incredibly important opportunity where we're part of a massive international effort to build the latest air warfare fifth generation plane that will assist in our defence.</text>
        <text id="20130220ec430cba635645ea80000388">Not only is it building capability in that sector but it gives us the capacity to move into other areas of advanced manufacturing that involve the capabilities that we develop in manufacturing and working with titanium. I think it's one of the only titanium plants in the southern hemisphere, and so that will not be described necessarily under the proposition that those advance as a particular manufacturing initiative, but of course it is. It builds not only capability in the defence sector, but also capability across a broader range of defence sector jobs.</text>
        <text id="20130220ec430cba635645ea80000389">If we look at the signals that we have been sending to manufacturers here in South Australia, just this morning I heard a fantastic story from SAGE Automation. SAGE Automation, which had principally been in the food industry, hadn't looked at mining and defence until this government laid out a clear strategic vision for mining and defence, and they decided to take the risk to invest in that particular sector.</text>
        <text id="20130220ec430cba635645ea80000390">Now, 15 per cent of their business comes from defence. They're not only just winning contracts down there at Techport, they're winning them from TALIS in Victoria and they have now got a new and growing segment of their business. That's the truth of what's happening in South Australia. It involves the government being assertive, it involves us upsetting the status quo, it involves us doing new things. I know that those sitting opposite are supporting established interests—</text>
        <text id="20130220ec430cba635645ea80000391">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="1">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130220ec430cba635645ea80000392">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  —but we are interested in doing new things to get this state moving.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130220ec430cba635645ea80000393">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> It would be helpful if the leader did not blaspheme in amongst his interjections. The member for Port Adelaide.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4338">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130220ec430cba635645ea80000394">
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL:</by>  Mr Speaker, could you just clarify when I blasphemed?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130220ec430cba635645ea80000395">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> I'm not going to repeat it. I'll speak to you privately if you come to the Chair. The member for Port Adelaide.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>