<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2013-02-19" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4329" />
  <endPage num="4406" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <text id="20130219a27a4dd8d33a454c80000457">
      <heading>Question Time</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Police Numbers</name>
      <text id="20130219a27a4dd8d33a454c80000458">
        <heading>POLICE NUMBERS</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Norwood</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-02-19">
            <name>POLICE NUMBERS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-02-19T14:24:00" />
        <text id="20130219a27a4dd8d33a454c80000459">
          <timeStamp time="2013-02-19T14:24:00" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Norwood—Leader of the Opposition) (14:24):</by>  My question is to the Premier. Who is right? Was the Premier right when he said, and I quote, 'There will be no cut in police numbers. In fact, police numbers will grow,' or was SAPOL's evidence to the Budget and Finance Committee right, that this financial year there will be a cut of 71 police officers?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-02-19">
            <name>POLICE NUMBERS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-02-19T14:25:00" />
        <text id="20130219a27a4dd8d33a454c80000460">
          <timeStamp time="2013-02-19T14:25:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier, Treasurer, Minister for State Development, Minister for the Public Sector, Minister for the Arts) (14:25):</by>  I thank the honourable member for his question and, unsurprisingly, I am right. Properly understood, I think the evidence that was given is really a discussion about the rate of growth of police numbers. I've got to say, it sits ill in the mouth of those opposite to be talking about police numbers when they couldn't actually furnish South Australia with the police force that it demands and needs.</text>
        <text id="20130219a27a4dd8d33a454c80000461">We have done that consistently during our term of office, and so what we are talking about here is the rate of growth of police numbers. The rate of growth of police numbers. Now, true it is that we've asked the police department, as we've asked every agency, to contribute to the savings effort. I might quickly add that the police agency has been asked to do less of the heavy lifting than almost any other agency, in recognition of the central role that they play in protecting our community and their need for resources.</text>
        <page num="4366" />
        <text id="20130219a27a4dd8d33a454c80000462">They have a relatively light savings task; we expect them to meet that. At the same time, in every year of the forward estimates, the police budget grows considerably, so we do expect police numbers to grow and not be cut. We've delivered 100-odd of the 300 that we committed to, and we will continue to work with the police agency. The minister will work with the police agency to make the sensible economies that will allow us to both achieve the savings targets and grow our police numbers.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>