<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2013-02-19" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4329" />
  <endPage num="4406" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <text id="20130219f4478946d5144d4180000407">
      <heading>Question Time</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Police Numbers</name>
      <text id="20130219f4478946d5144d4180000408">
        <heading>POLICE NUMBERS</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Norwood</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-02-19">
            <name>POLICE NUMBERS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-02-19T14:12:00" />
        <text id="20130219f4478946d5144d4180000409">
          <timeStamp time="2013-02-19T14:12:00" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Norwood—Leader of the Opposition) (14:12):</by>  My question is to the Premier. Does the Premier stand by his promise of 300 extra police officers by 2016, revised from Labor's previous promise of 300 extra police by 2014?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-02-19">
            <name>POLICE NUMBERS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-02-19T14:12:00" />
        <text id="20130219f4478946d5144d4180000410">
          <timeStamp time="2013-02-19T14:12:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier, Treasurer, Minister for State Development, Minister for the Public Sector, Minister for the Arts) (14:12):</by>  As the member would be aware, there has been some discussion recently about the numbers in our South Australian police force. Perhaps by way of preface, it is worth bringing to the attention of the house that the number of police in this state is the highest per capita of any state in the commonwealth, and by some considerable margin, I might say.</text>
        <text id="20130219f4478946d5144d4180000411">That, of course, is part and parcel of the reason why we have been able to deliver an almost 40 per cent reduction in victim-reported crime over the last 10 years—and just remember what that involves. That involves recruiting against attrition—so replacing those police officers who leave—and then, in addition to that, putting in additional numbers of police that has led us to that particular outcome.</text>
        <page num="4363" />
        <text id="20130219f4478946d5144d4180000412">In the 2010, I think, budget arrangements—indeed, the Mid-Year Budget Review, I think—there was, in fact, a rephasing of some of the commitments that were given by the government in relation to its commitment to employ an additional 300 police officers. I think in the order of 100—I think in the order of 116, in fact—of those additional 300 police officers have already been recruited. The proposition we took to the people was that we would employ an additional 300 police officers—we have an additional 100-odd police officers—and we have pushed out the time line for doing that to 2016, and that remains our present intention.</text>
        <text id="20130219f4478946d5144d4180000413">What members need to be aware of is that every government agency has been asked to make savings. In relation to the police department, some of the more modest savings have been asked of the police department in recognition of the fact that this is a particular priority of government. So, we do expect them to maintain their savings. Despite the fact that they have been asked to make savings, the amount of money that goes to the police department continues to grow throughout the forward estimates. So, it is our intention to meet our targets, as we have outlined.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4338">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130219f4478946d5144d4180000414">
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL:</by>  Supplementary, Mr Speaker.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130219f4478946d5144d4180000415">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> If indeed it is a supplementary.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>