<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2013-02-07" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4259" />
  <endPage num="4330" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Murray River</name>
      <text id="2013020743c6918ab3f84e5cb0000481">
        <heading>MURRAY RIVER</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="538" kind="question">
        <name>Mrs GERAGHTY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Torrens</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-02-07">
            <name>MURRAY RIVER</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-02-07T14:44:00" />
        <text id="2013020743c6918ab3f84e5cb0000482">
          <timeStamp time="2013-02-07T14:44:00" />
          <by role="member" id="538">Mrs GERAGHTY (Torrens) (14:44):</by>  My question is to the Premier. Can the Premier inform the house about the latest win for South Australia in returning water to deliver a healthy River Murray?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2013020743c6918ab3f84e5cb0000483">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> I detect some comment in that question. The Premier.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2013-02-07T14:44:00" />
        <text id="2013020743c6918ab3f84e5cb0000484">
          <timeStamp time="2013-02-07T14:44:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier, Treasurer, Minister for State Development, Minister for the Public Sector, Minister for the Arts) (14:44):</by>  Today marks the achievement of another crucial milestone in our fight to secure a healthy River Murray. Earlier today, the federal parliament passed an important piece of legislation securing $1.77 billion in funding to ensure the River Murray receives enough water to remain healthy.</text>
        <text id="2013020743c6918ab3f84e5cb0000485">This is an extraordinary achievement for South Australia. This piece of legislation would not have existed but for South Australia's fight. We led the fight to ensure the Murray-Darling Basin plan provided 3,200 gigalitres of water that scientists verified was needed for the river's long-term health. Of this funding, $1.57 billion will secure an extra 450 gigalitres above the 2,750 outlined in the draft plan.</text>
        <text id="2013020743c6918ab3f84e5cb0000486">The additional water is critical to ensure that two million tonnes of salt are exported out of the Murray Mouth each year to keep salinity in the Lower Lakes and the Coorong below the dangerous thresholds for the survival of native plants and animals. It will also keep water levels in the Lower Lakes at a level to avoid acidification and riverbank collapse below Lock 1, and improve the ability of flood plains to support healthy red gum forests and water bird and fish breeding. The additional 450 gigalitres will be recovered through water recovery projects and works throughout the Murray-Darling Basin. Importantly, it will be done—</text>
        <text id="2013020743c6918ab3f84e5cb0000487">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="1">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2013020743c6918ab3f84e5cb0000488">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  No, that was removed.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531" kind="interjection">
        <name>An honourable member</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2013020743c6918ab3f84e5cb0000489">
          <by role="member" id="531">An honourable member:</by>  Up to.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2013020743c6918ab3f84e5cb0000490">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  No, that's wrong. You are working on old time. Importantly, it was done in a way that minimises the impact on communities through projects such as improving the efficiency of on-farm use. There has been $200 million set aside to address key constraints that currently limit the amount of water that can flow down the river. Remember their first argument? 'We can't give you any extra water because there are natural constraints that won't let us bring it down.' We have shown that that's wrong.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4342">
        <name>Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2013020743c6918ab3f84e5cb0000491">
          <by role="member" id="4342">Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN:</by>  Point of order: I believe the Premier is entering into debate when he says, 'Remember their first argument?'</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2013020743c6918ab3f84e5cb0000492">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> I am not sure what he means by the pronoun 'they'. We will find out as the answer continues.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2013020743c6918ab3f84e5cb0000493">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  'They' referred to the Murray-Darling Basin Authority and the upstream interests. It might be consciousness of guilt, but it certainly wasn't directed at those opposite. So, $200 million has been set aside to address key constraints which currently limit the amount of water that can flow down the river. The South Australian government called for the Australian government to listen to the scientists, to listen to what they were saying about what we needed for a healthy river, and they have responded. We have worked hard to ensure that South Australia's voice was heard in Canberra. I want to pay particular tribute to the role that the former minister, the member for Colton, played in uniting—</text>
        <text id="2013020743c6918ab3f84e5cb0000494">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="42">Mr Pederick interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2013020743c6918ab3f84e5cb0000495">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> Premier, will you be seated for a minute? I call the member for Hammond to order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2013020743c6918ab3f84e5cb0000496">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  What he managed to do was unite the river communities, irrigators and environmentalists, city and country, farmers, irrigators, environmentalists and water users of the river, up and down the length of the river. It was a difficult task. It's fair to say that some of the places we went to are not known for their particular affinity to our political party. In fact, I can recount many anecdotes of people slapping me on the back and saying what a fantastic job we had done and also quickly adding that they would never vote for me.</text>
        <text id="2013020743c6918ab3f84e5cb0000497">But can I say that this was an extraordinary act of unity by the South Australian community. We know what effect it had on the federal opposition. We had that extraordinary proposition where the federal MPs all managed to place pressure then on Tony Abbott to get him to not oppose this legislation in the federal parliament. I can say that, unless we had united as a state, that pressure would not have been applied.</text>
        <text id="2013020743c6918ab3f84e5cb0000498">They were so proud of themselves they put a half-page ad in the paper afterwards claiming the credit for it, but I am happy for everybody to join in and take credit. Of course, victory has many authors; failure is an orphan, but we have been victorious on this occasion.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2013020743c6918ab3f84e5cb0000499">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> On that note, the Premier's time has expired. The Deputy Leader of the Opposition.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>