<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2013-02-05" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4121" />
  <endPage num="4192" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>School Funding</name>
      <text id="2013020500755f14c628459980000654">
        <heading>SCHOOL FUNDING</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="535" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Kaurna</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-02-05">
            <name>SCHOOL FUNDING</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-02-05T14:55:00" />
        <text id="2013020500755f14c628459980000655">
          <timeStamp time="2013-02-05T14:55:00" />
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL (Kaurna) (14:55):</by>  Thank you, Mr Speaker; it is the first time I have been called that in 11 years, so, Mr Speaker, I thank you. Can the Minister for Education and Child Development compare SA's funding of government schools to that of other states?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="614" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.M. RANKINE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Wright</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Education and Child Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Multicultural Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-02-05">
            <name>SCHOOL FUNDING</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-02-05T14:55:00" />
        <page num="4158" />
        <text id="2013020500755f14c628459980000656">
          <timeStamp time="2013-02-05T14:55:00" />
          <by role="member" id="614">The Hon. J.M. RANKINE (Wright—Minister for Education and Child Development, Minister for Multicultural Affairs) (14:55):</by>  I thank the member for Kaurna for his question. I know that, being a former teacher, he has always maintained a very strong interest in public education, particularly those schools in his electorate.</text>
        <text id="2013020500755f14c628459980000657">The most recent Report on Government Services indicates that nationally the average state government contribution per student fell by $299; however, South Australia defied this national trend. South Australia recorded the biggest increase to the average government spend, with an extra $782 a year. According to the latest Report on Government Services, students in our public schools now receive more funding than the national average for their education.</text>
        <text id="2013020500755f14c628459980000658">In other states, the average spend per student actually declined: by $578 in New South Wales, by $360 in Victoria, and by $454 in Western Australia. I think every parent in South Australia should look at these numbers and feel proud that South Australia is bucking this trend. The Report on Government Services—</text>
        <text id="2013020500755f14c628459980000659">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="46">Mr Pisoni interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="614" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.M. RANKINE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2013020500755f14c628459980000660">
          <by role="member" id="614">The Hon. J.M. RANKINE:</by>  The report on government services also shows that the high level of investment by the state government in preschool services is taking financial pressure off parents. By investing in the future of our state's children, we are encouraging high participation levels, with 86.3 per cent of our state's four year olds enrolled in government-funded preschools. This compares to the national figure of 58.9. South Australia also reported the lowest average charge for family day care in the country.</text>
        <text id="2013020500755f14c628459980000661">Mr Speaker, I note the opposition have attempted to back away from their plan to cut Public Service jobs, but I haven't heard anything from the Leader of the Opposition or the shadow spokesperson refuting his predecessor's plan to gut the education department.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2013020500755f14c628459980000662">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN:</by>  Point of order—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2013020500755f14c628459980000663">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> Minister, the standing orders say that ministers are not to debate in their answers, so although it is a very fine point, could the minister return to the substance—</text>
        <text id="2013020500755f14c628459980000664">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2013020500755f14c628459980000665">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> —of the Dorothy?</text>
        <text id="2013020500755f14c628459980000666">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2013020500755f14c628459980000667">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> Minister.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="614">
        <name>The Hon. J.M. RANKINE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2013020500755f14c628459980000668">
          <by role="member" id="614">The Hon. J.M. RANKINE:</by>  Thank you, sir.</text>
        <text id="2013020500755f14c628459980000669">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Hon. J.J. SNELLING</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2013020500755f14c628459980000670">
          <by role="member" id="627">The Hon. J.J. SNELLING:</by>  Point of order, Mr Speaker.</text>
        <text id="2013020500755f14c628459980000671">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Hon. J.J. SNELLING</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2013020500755f14c628459980000672">
          <by role="member" id="627">The Hon. J.J. SNELLING:</by>  The point of order that says it is out of order to interject. The Minister for Education has had to put up with persistent interjections from the member for Unley, and now the members opposite are behaving like a raucous mob rather than an opposition.</text>
        <text id="2013020500755f14c628459980000673">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2013020500755f14c628459980000674">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> I think it is most unfortunate that the opposition took advantage of my ruling, so I would ask them to be quiet and listen to the remainder of the minister's answer. Minister for Education.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="614">
        <name>The Hon. J.M. RANKINE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2013020500755f14c628459980000675">
          <by role="member" id="614">The Hon. J.M. RANKINE:</by>  Can I point out that something like 22,800 people—more than that—are employed by the education department under the Education Act, 6.6 per cent of people are employed under the Children's Services Act, and we also employ many other people, people who are speech pathologists, curriculum counsellors, psychologists—these are the so-called 'bureaucrats' they want to cut.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2013020500755f14c628459980000676">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN:</by>  Mr Speaker, point of order: the minister is defying your ruling. You have already cautioned her about debating. She has completed her statement on a clear debate point.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="4159" />
        <text id="2013020500755f14c628459980000677">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> The deputy leader will be seated. That is not actually a point of order. The minister, upon resuming the answer, addressed the substance of the question. There is no point of order, and I take the same view as the commonwealth House of Representatives—that frivolous or vexatious points of order are an obstruction of the business of the house.</text>
        <text id="2013020500755f14c628459980000678">I think that was a frivolous and vexatious point of order from the deputy leader. I won't hesitate to remove members who obstruct the business of the house by taking frivolous or vexatious points of order. It is particularly a pity, since the member for Bragg has been on her best behaviour today until that point.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>