<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2012-11-28" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3941" />
  <endPage num="4031" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Murray River</name>
      <text id="20121128f2cb6475561d46e5b0000760">
        <heading>MURRAY RIVER</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-11-28">
            <name>MURRAY RIVER</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2012-11-28T14:42:00" />
        <page num="3983" />
        <text id="20121128f2cb6475561d46e5b0000761">
          <timeStamp time="2012-11-28T14:42:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg) (14:42):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Water and the River Murray. Will the minister confirm that, despite widespread agreement that water needs to be returned to the River Murray, the government plans to increase the amount of water taken from the river and provided to SA Water customers over the next three years? SA Water's regulatory business proposal submitted to ESCOSA shows the government plans to increase the amount of River Murray water used by almost 10 per cent by 2015-16. This at the same time the government plans to mothball the desalination plant that is meant to reduce our reliance on the Murray.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1802" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. CAICA</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Colton</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Sustainability</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Water and the River Murray</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Reconciliation</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-11-28">
            <name>MURRAY RIVER</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2012-11-28T14:43:00" />
        <text id="20121128f2cb6475561d46e5b0000762">
          <timeStamp time="2012-11-28T14:43:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1802">The Hon. P. CAICA (Colton—Minister for Sustainability, Environment and Conservation, Minister for Water and the River Murray, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Reconciliation) (14:43):</by>  Let me put it this way: SA Water will only take from the river what it is entitled to under its licence. As we all know, in making sure that people in urban Adelaide play their part in ensuring that the burden of adjustment on irrigators is lessened, SA Water is looking at providing water from its entitlement back to the commonwealth through the buyback program.</text>
        <text id="20121128f2cb6475561d46e5b0000763">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1802" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. P. CAICA</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20121128f2cb6475561d46e5b0000764">
          <by role="member" id="1802">The Hon. P. CAICA:</by>  The member for Chaffey is aware of this. The difficulty with the member for Chaffey is that his electorate is more across things than he is when it comes to understanding what is going on with respect to the Murray-Darling Basin plan. That is why it has been very good to work with the people from the Riverland communities and their representatives who have been right behind the campaign of the government to fight for the Murray.</text>
        <text id="20121128f2cb6475561d46e5b0000765">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1802" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. P. CAICA</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20121128f2cb6475561d46e5b0000766">
          <by role="member" id="1802">The Hon. P. CAICA:</by>  They will operate within whatever entitlement they have at any point in time, so it is quite simple.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>