<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2012-11-13" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3641" />
  <endPage num="3711" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Bills</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Payroll Tax (Miscellaneous) Amendment Bill</name>
      <text id="20121113e0b6dfca2592492ba0000291">
        <heading>PAYROLL TAX (MISCELLANEOUS) AMENDMENT BILL</heading>
      </text>
      <subproceeding>
        <name>Second Reading</name>
        <text id="20121113e0b6dfca2592492ba0000292">
          <heading>Second Reading</heading>
        </text>
        <text id="20121113e0b6dfca2592492ba0000293">Adjourned debate on second reading.</text>
        <text id="20121113e0b6dfca2592492ba0000294">(Continued from 18 October 2012.)</text>
        <talker role="member" id="563" kind="speech">
          <name>The Hon. I.F. EVANS</name>
          <house>House of Assembly</house>
          <electorate id="">Davenport</electorate>
          <startTime time="2012-11-13T12:26:00" />
          <page num="3660" />
          <text id="20121113e0b6dfca2592492ba0000295">
            <timeStamp time="2012-11-13T12:26:00" />
            <by role="member" id="563">The Hon. I.F. EVANS (Davenport) (12:26):</by>  This bill contains two amendments to the Payroll Tax Act 2009 and really is about harmonising the definition of payroll between states. Essentially, the first amendment removes outdated references to the commonwealth legislation in the employee share scheme provisions. The commonwealth announced changes to the method of taxing employee share schemes in the 2009 budget. Retrospective commonwealth legislation was assented to on 14 December 2009 and included the transfer of relevant provisions from the Income Tax Assessment Act to the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997. The retrospective effect of the commonwealth legislation and changes in the way the new commonwealth legislation taxes shares and options has made it necessary to amend the provisions of this act.</text>
          <text id="20121113e0b6dfca2592492ba0000296">Traditional provisions will allow employers to pay payroll tax on the grant of shares and options from 1 July 2009 before 1 July 2013 under the current provisions or under the current proposed new provisions. There is considered to be little material difference in the impact of the two sets of provisions but we are seeking industry feedback. We have only had one minor comment which I will read in for the Treasurer to consider between houses.</text>
          <text id="20121113e0b6dfca2592492ba0000297">The second amendment clarifies the application of the maternity and adoption leave payroll tax exemption. At present the 14-week exemption period can be pro rata to the equivalent of 14 weeks leave for full-time employees who take their leave at less than full pay. The act does not provide the same treatment for part-time employees. The proposed amendment seeks to ensure consistent and fair treatment of the wages paid to full-time and part-time employees and will clearly state that the 14-week period can be pro rata for part-time employees also.</text>
          <text id="20121113e0b6dfca2592492ba0000298">We sought feedback from a range of industry associations. The one that got back to us was the Law Society and, so the Treasurer can consider this matter, I will read it into <term>Hansard</term> and he can consider it between houses, and we will ask the minister in the other place for an answer in relation to the Law Society's point. We sent the bill to the Law Society. The Law Society advised us that the matter was considered by their Commercial Law Committee and they provided the following comments:</text>
          <text continued="true" id="20121113e0b6dfca2592492ba0000299">
            <inserted>Clause 6.1—When a share or option is granted</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="20121113e0b6dfca2592492ba0000300">
            <inserted>This clause proposes to amend section 19(2) of the Payroll Tax Act 2009. We refer to the recent Full Federal Court decision in Federal Commissioner of Taxation v McWilliams [2012] FCAFC 105 in relation to the acquisition date of share options. We query whether this case was taken into account during the drafting of the proposed section 19(2) since, as we understand it, the policy is to reflect the Commonwealth provisions in relation to the employee share schemes. Further, the current section 19(2) refers to the repeal provisions of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 and we query whether a replacement of those references to the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 is more appropriate or whether this is a specific intent to clarify when an option or share is granted.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text continued="true" id="20121113e0b6dfca2592492ba0000301">
            <inserted>Clause 6(2)—Vesting date.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="20121113e0b6dfca2592492ba0000302">
            <inserted>This clause proposes to amend section 19 subsections (3) and (4) of the <term>Payroll Tax Act</term>...to reflect changes in the Commonwealth employee share scheme provisions by providing that the vesting date of a share or option is the date at the end of 7 years after the grant of the share or option. However, the Commonwealth <term>Income</term><term>Tax Assessment Act 1997</term> includes another taxing point which is not referred to in these amendments. This is the cessation of employment in respect of which an employee acquires their interest (section 83A-115(5) and section 83A-120(5)). We query whether this specific taxing point in the Commonwealth provisions has been intentionally omitted in these amendments.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text continued="true" id="20121113e0b6dfca2592492ba0000303">
            <inserted>Clause 7—Value of shares and options</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="20121113e0b6dfca2592492ba0000304">
            <inserted>The proposed new section 23(6) refers to 'any other necessary modifications'. We query whether this provides sufficient certainty or whether other guidance will be provided to taxpayers in relation to what this term means.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text continued="true" id="20121113e0b6dfca2592492ba0000305">The opposition supports the principle of the bill. I do not expect the Treasurer to clarify those matters now because they are very technical and relate to matters in the Federal Court but, if he could have a look at them between the houses and provide clarification in the upper house, that would be sufficient. On that basis, the opposition supports the bill.</text>
        </talker>
        <talker role="member" id="627" kind="speech">
          <name>The Hon. J.J. SNELLING</name>
          <house>House of Assembly</house>
          <electorate id="">Playford</electorate>
          <portfolios>
            <portfolio id="">
              <name>Minister for Workers Rehabilitation</name>
            </portfolio>
            <portfolio id="">
              <name>Minister for Defence Industries</name>
            </portfolio>
            <portfolio id="">
              <name>Minister for Veterans' Affairs</name>
            </portfolio>
          </portfolios>
          <startTime time="2012-11-13T12:31:00" />
          <text id="20121113e0b6dfca2592492ba0000306">
            <timeStamp time="2012-11-13T12:31:00" />
            <by role="member" id="627">The Hon. J.J. SNELLING (Playford—Treasurer, Minister for Workers Rehabilitation, Minister for Defence Industries, Minister for Veterans' Affairs) (12:31):</by>  I thank the opposition for their support and I am more than happy to get back to the member for Davenport between the houses with a response to the Law Society's query.</text>
          <text id="20121113e0b6dfca2592492ba0000307">Bill read a second time.</text>
        </talker>
      </subproceeding>
      <subproceeding>
        <name>Third Reading</name>
        <text id="20121113e0b6dfca2592492ba0000308">
          <heading>Third Reading</heading>
        </text>
        <talker role="member" id="627" kind="speech">
          <name>The Hon. J.J. SNELLING</name>
          <house>House of Assembly</house>
          <electorate id="">Playford</electorate>
          <portfolios>
            <portfolio id="">
              <name>Minister for Workers Rehabilitation</name>
            </portfolio>
            <portfolio id="">
              <name>Minister for Defence Industries</name>
            </portfolio>
            <portfolio id="">
              <name>Minister for Veterans' Affairs</name>
            </portfolio>
          </portfolios>
          <startTime time="2012-11-13T12:32:00" />
          <text id="20121113e0b6dfca2592492ba0000309">
            <timeStamp time="2012-11-13T12:32:00" />
            <by role="member" id="627">The Hon. J.J. SNELLING (Playford—Treasurer, Minister for Workers Rehabilitation, Minister for Defence Industries, Minister for Veterans' Affairs) (12:32):</by>  I move:</text>
          <text id="20121113e0b6dfca2592492ba0000310">
            <inserted>That this bill be now read a third time.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="20121113e0b6dfca2592492ba0000311">Bill read a third time and passed.</text>
        </talker>
      </subproceeding>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>