<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2012-10-17" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3183" />
  <endPage num="3277" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Police Photo Identification</name>
      <text id="20121017677d8cb356d345a6a0000588">
        <heading>POLICE PHOTO IDENTIFICATION</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4337" kind="question">
        <name>Mr SIBBONS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Mitchell</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-10-17">
            <name>POLICE PHOTO IDENTIFICATION</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2012-10-17T14:55:00" />
        <text id="20121017677d8cb356d345a6a0000589">
          <timeStamp time="2012-10-17T14:55:00" />
          <by role="member" id="4337">Mr SIBBONS (Mitchell) (14:55):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Police. Can the minister advise the house of responses to SAPOL's briefings regarding the use of photographs as a means of identification and their progress in garnering support for this proposal?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="614" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.M. RANKINE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Wright</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Police</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Correctional Services</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Emergency Services</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Road Safety</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Multicultural Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-10-17">
            <name>POLICE PHOTO IDENTIFICATION</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2012-10-17T14:55:00" />
        <text id="20121017677d8cb356d345a6a0000590">
          <timeStamp time="2012-10-17T14:55:00" />
          <by role="member" id="614">The Hon. J.M. RANKINE (Wright—Minister for Police, Minister for Correctional Services, Minister for Emergency Services, Minister for Road Safety, Minister for Multicultural Affairs) (14:55):</by>  I thank the member for Mitchell for his question, and I appreciate his unwavering and consistent support for SAPOL and the use of modern policing techniques. In 2011 SAPOL provided briefings to parliamentarians explaining existing procedures as well as the benefits of using photographic boards for identifying suspects. </text>
        <text id="20121017677d8cb356d345a6a0000591">
          <inserted>It is my political judgement that it would be a distortion of the science and reckless lawmaking. With a photo board there is no safeguard against police suggestion. One thing is clear from the briefings from SA Police: SAPOL practice does not follow best practice. It would be bizarre for us to treat lightly an area of law which is like a bagful of seeds for potential miscarriages of justice.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="20121017677d8cb356d345a6a0000592">These are the contributions of the shadow attorney-general last year when the government had this legislation in the parliament.</text>
        <page num="3221" />
        <text id="20121017677d8cb356d345a6a0000593">On 19 September this year, SAPOL contacted my office with very positive news that the opposition may be reconsidering their view on this proposal and offered to further brief the shadow attorney-general, the Hon. Stephen Wade. The shadow attorney-general's office was contacted that very day, and on 20 September we were advised that their position was unchanged and no briefing would be required. Given the importance of this issue, a further offer was made for a police briefing, even if the opposition policy had not changed. I am advised that a response was received on 21 September rejecting any and all discussion on the issue.</text>
        <text id="20121017677d8cb356d345a6a0000594">I want to commend SAPOL for their ongoing effort to educate policymakers about this issue. You can imagine my pleasant surprise yesterday at the Police Association conference, as the Leader of the Opposition embraced this policy as her own and stated, 'Line-ups consume up to 60 hours of work by 10 police officers,' the precise argument put forward by Labor at the 2010 election and the Attorney-General in the 2010 election. By coincidence, this is the same argument lambasted by the shadow attorney-general; but today the shadow attorney-general—</text>
        <text id="20121017677d8cb356d345a6a0000595">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20121017677d8cb356d345a6a0000596">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="614">
        <name>The Hon. J.M. RANKINE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20121017677d8cb356d345a6a0000597">
          <by role="member" id="614">The Hon. J.M. RANKINE:</by>  —is reported as saying:</text>
        <text id="20121017677d8cb356d345a6a0000598">
          <inserted>It is not a change of direction. The section that allows for this type of evidence would only become operative when regulations are in place that provide adequate police resources to make sure the procedure is properly conducted.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="20121017677d8cb356d345a6a0000599">I would be very pleased to hear a commitment about police resources and police numbers. We have had nothing but silence on this issue. Nothing at estimates and nothing said yesterday about police numbers—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4343">
        <name>Mr GARDNER</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20121017677d8cb356d345a6a0000600">
          <by role="member" id="4343">Mr GARDNER:</by>  Point of order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20121017677d8cb356d345a6a0000601">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! Minister, sit down. Point of order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4343">
        <name>Mr GARDNER</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20121017677d8cb356d345a6a0000602">
          <by role="member" id="4343">Mr GARDNER:</by>  Madam Speaker, I haven't been timing, but it feels like this answer has been going for at least 15 minutes. Can you please end it?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20121017677d8cb356d345a6a0000603">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> No; she has 37 seconds left.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="614">
        <name>The Hon. J.M. RANKINE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20121017677d8cb356d345a6a0000604">
          <by role="member" id="614">The Hon. J.M. RANKINE:</by>  Thank you, Madam Speaker. It just goes to show how convincing SAPOL can be, particularly when the leader is facing a police conference.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20121017677d8cb356d345a6a0000605">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> Time can pass very slowly in this chamber, member for Morialta. Fifteen years for me feels like 137. The minister was well within her time. The member for Davenport.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>