<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2012-10-17" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3183" />
  <endPage num="3277" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Marine Parks</name>
      <text id="20121017fdd9301191a1465d90000583">
        <heading>MARINE PARKS</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4341" kind="question">
        <name>Mr TRELOAR</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Flinders</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-10-17">
            <name>MARINE PARKS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2012-10-17T14:53:00" />
        <text id="20121017fdd9301191a1465d90000584">
          <timeStamp time="2012-10-17T14:53:00" />
          <by role="member" id="4341">Mr TRELOAR (Flinders) (14:53):</by>  Madam Speaker, I have a supplementary question. Given the minister's answer, does he then concede that a reduced area available for quota fisheries will result in overfishing of that remaining water?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1802" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. CAICA</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Colton</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Sustainability</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Water and the River Murray</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Reconciliation</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-10-17">
            <name>MARINE PARKS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2012-10-17T14:53:00" />
        <text id="20121017fdd9301191a1465d90000585">
          <timeStamp time="2012-10-17T14:53:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1802">The Hon. P. CAICA (Colton—Minister for Sustainability, Environment and Conservation, Minister for Water and the River Murray, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Reconciliation) (14:53):</by>  We as a government have always made sure that we've fulfilled our commitments. Our commitment has been to ensure that marine parks will have less than a 5 per cent economic impact on the state's fishing industry, and that is measured as impact on the statewide annual gross value of production.</text>
        <text id="20121017fdd9301191a1465d90000586">What we have attempted to do is zone in such a way that we would minimise displacement. In fact, the first process was to avoid displacement and, secondly, then zone in such a way that, where there was displacement, there was activity that would be able to replace that currently being undertaken in a sanctuary zone; from there, there would be buyback. Finally, there would be compulsory acquisition which I hope we never get to.</text>
        <text id="20121017fdd9301191a1465d90000587">We have met every commitment to date. Of course, part and parcel of this process is to ensure that there is fair and reasonable return for those fisheries that are impacted upon because, in the medium to long term, what we still know is that the benefits will be multiple. In fact, the benefits, as I said, will be felt not only by recreational anglers, which in its own way is as big an industry and as valuable an industry to South Australia as the commercial fishing industry, but they will also accrue to the commercial sector.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>