<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2012-10-16" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3101" />
  <endPage num="3186" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Desalination Plant</name>
      <text id="20121016e9094afe55c14a9580000767">
        <heading>DESALINATION PLANT</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="546" kind="question">
        <name>Mr WILLIAMS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">MacKillop</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-10-16">
            <name>DESALINATION PLANT</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2012-10-16T15:10:00" />
        <text id="20121016e9094afe55c14a9580000768">
          <timeStamp time="2012-10-16T15:10:00" />
          <by role="member" id="546">Mr WILLIAMS (MacKillop—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (15:10):</by>  As a supplementary, given the Premier's analysis concerning the $228 million of commonwealth funding—and therefore it is not taxpayers' money—when did the Premier and the government first become aware that $216 million of that was going to be offset against our GST payments?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20121016e9094afe55c14a9580000769">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> That is a completely new question but, Premier, do you wish to answer that?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State Development</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2012-10-16T15:11:00" />
        <text id="20121016e9094afe55c14a9580000770">
          <timeStamp time="2012-10-16T15:11:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier, Minister for State Development) (15:11):</by>  The analysis that we engaged in deciding to go from a 50 to a 100 gigalitre plant is completely and utterly incontrovertible.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="546" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Williams</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20121016e9094afe55c14a9580000771">
          <by role="member" id="546">Mr Williams:</by>  Not based on this report. Not based on this.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20121016e9094afe55c14a9580000772">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  It is, and we would have made that decision in any of these circumstances. We did have the advantage of the commonwealth contribution which does assist us in the short term to raise the capital costs associated with meeting the cost of the plant. There is no doubt about that. It does have a GST effect over time but this assisted the government to make the capital spending decision that it did and this of course has had the effect of reducing the burden on consumers. By not having that contained—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="546">
        <name>Mr WILLIAMS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20121016e9094afe55c14a9580000773">
          <by role="member" id="546">Mr WILLIAMS:</by>  Point of order. The question was: when did the government become aware—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20121016e9094afe55c14a9580000774">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> Thank you, there is no point of order.</text>
        <text id="20121016e9094afe55c14a9580000775">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="9">The Hon. P.F. Conlon interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="546">
        <name>Mr WILLIAMS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20121016e9094afe55c14a9580000776">
          <by role="member" id="546">Mr WILLIAMS:</by>  It's 98, it's relevance. The question was—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20121016e9094afe55c14a9580000777">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> Order! There is no point of order. The Premier can answer this as he chooses. We will wait and see what he says.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="3144" />
        <text id="20121016e9094afe55c14a9580000778">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  Madam Speaker, we are always aware of the way in which the rules of horizontal fiscal equalisation work. We actually understand how those rules work. We are also very familiar with how Tony Abbott wants to change them to actually rip a billion dollars out of the South Australian budget because he wants to go a per capita funding model, so we understand how HFE works. It works in South Australia's interest and we are defending it.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>