<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2012-10-16" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3101" />
  <endPage num="3186" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Water Pricing</name>
      <text id="20121016101609d122214d37a0000637">
        <heading>WATER PRICING</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="546" kind="question">
        <name>Mr WILLIAMS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">MacKillop</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-10-16">
            <name>WATER PRICING</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2012-10-16T14:44:00" />
        <text id="20121016101609d122214d37a0000638">
          <timeStamp time="2012-10-16T14:44:00" />
          <by role="member" id="546">Mr WILLIAMS (MacKillop—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (14:44):</by>  My question is to the Premier. Does the government believe that the assumption used in the 2009 KPMG report, released only last week, that water prices would rise by 8 per cent per year post year 2008-09 was a reasonable assumption? Last week the Premier released a report by KPMG, which was dated 3 June 2009, almost a month after the announcement to double the size of the desalination plant. The report assumes that water prices would rise by 8 per cent per year from 2008-09, yet post the 2010 election water prices in South Australia rose each year, according to government budget papers, by 22 per cent, 40 per cent and 25 per cent respectively.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State Development</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-10-16">
            <name>WATER PRICING</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2012-10-16T14:44:00" />
        <text id="20121016101609d122214d37a0000639">
          <timeStamp time="2012-10-16T14:44:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier, Minister for State Development) (14:44): </by> There is no doubt that the desalination plant is an expensive way of delivering water. That is why we hesitated to make the decision. It is why we are not going to run the plant unnecessarily, and it is why also in the last budget we introduced a $45 and $75 rebate, depending on the amount of consumption you have, to reduce the burden on consumers of water. We do understand cost of living pressures and we understand that we need to respond to them, but I think most people realise they live in the driest state on the driest continent and that this is an insurance premium worth paying.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="546">
        <name>Mr WILLIAMS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20121016101609d122214d37a0000640">
          <by role="member" id="546">Mr WILLIAMS: </by> Standing order 98: relevance. The question was: does the Premier believe that the assumption of 8 per cent water price increases was a reasonable assumption?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20121016101609d122214d37a0000641">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> The Premier is talking about substance relevant to the question and he can continue if he chooses. There is no issue of debate. Have you finished Premier?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20121016101609d122214d37a0000642">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL: </by> Yes.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>