<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2012-09-20" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3043" />
  <endPage num="3104" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Bulk Commodities Port</name>
      <text id="2012092091f242759703491ea0000748">
        <heading>BULK COMMODITIES PORT</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-09-20">
            <name>BULK COMMODITIES PORT</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2012-09-20T15:10:00" />
        <page num="3090" />
        <text id="2012092091f242759703491ea0000749">
          <timeStamp time="2012-09-20T15:10:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg) (15:10):</by>  Will the minister then confirm if there is any part of the proposal which includes any contribution from state revenue?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Elder</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Transport and Infrastructure</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Housing and Urban Development</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-09-20">
            <name>BULK COMMODITIES PORT</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2012-09-20T15:10:00" />
        <text id="2012092091f242759703491ea0000750">
          <timeStamp time="2012-09-20T15:10:00" />
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON (Elder—Minister for Transport and Infrastructure, Minister for Housing and Urban Development) (15:10):</by>  I have to say I am struggling to remember the details of it. It would depend on what the response was from the commonwealth. If the commonwealth said to us that there were a possibility of funding, if there was something from it ourselves, that does not mean that we would be getting into the port business. It does not mean, for example, that if we offer an assistance package to Mitsubishi or we offer an assistance package to the forestry industry that we are getting into the timber industry, although we are in the timber industry, I must say.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3120" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Pederick</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2012092091f242759703491ea0000751">
          <by role="member" id="3120">Mr Pederick:</by>  You're getting out of it.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2012092091f242759703491ea0000752">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON:</by>  Well, and there we go, we're 'getting out of it'. Again, the confusion on the other side. We are in the timber industry to sell timber. What we do is sell timber, and what we are proposing to do is sell timber from our timber industry. We believe that if you want us to be in the timber industry, that is the best thing we can do. As I understand the proposal with the Treasurer, instead of selling this rotation, we are selling a number of forward rotations because we get a good deal for it. So, what we are doing, in business—</text>
        <text id="2012092091f242759703491ea0000753">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2012092091f242759703491ea0000754">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2012092091f242759703491ea0000755">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON:</by>  —is selling timber—</text>
        <text id="2012092091f242759703491ea0000756">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2012092091f242759703491ea0000757">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2012092091f242759703491ea0000758">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON:</by>  —on the best possible terms and we think that—</text>
        <text id="2012092091f242759703491ea0000759">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2012092091f242759703491ea0000760">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2012092091f242759703491ea0000761">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON:</by>  —is pretty smart. I know you think we are not very good at business but we think selling on the best possible terms is a pretty smart deal.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2012092091f242759703491ea0000762">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN:</by>  Point of order, Madam Speaker.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2012092091f242759703491ea0000763">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> Point of order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2012092091f242759703491ea0000764">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN:</by>  All very interesting with forestry but I have asked about the ports and whether there is any state money in the proposal to Infrastructure Australia for the ports proposal, from South Australia's revenue?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2012092091f242759703491ea0000765">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON:</by>  Sorry, I did respond to interjections and I should not have done that. Can I indicate to the member for Bragg that I am not sure that we are going to see any funds from the commonwealth on a port. If there were some, they may apply conditions and they may ask us. But I can guarantee this to the member for Bragg: I have no budget for a contribution to a bulk commodity port and I know of no minister that does.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>