<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2012-09-20" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3043" />
  <endPage num="3104" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Bulk Commodities Port</name>
      <text id="201209200c89e7d1aa95412ca0000740">
        <heading>BULK COMMODITIES PORT</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-09-20">
            <name>BULK COMMODITIES PORT</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2012-09-20T15:07:00" />
        <text id="201209200c89e7d1aa95412ca0000741">
          <timeStamp time="2012-09-20T15:07:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg) (15:07):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Transport and Infrastructure. Why is the state government applying to Infrastructure Australia for funding to build a bulk commodities port on Eyre Peninsula when the minister for industry and trade has publicly stated that the state government has no intention of returning to the ports business?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Elder</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Transport and Infrastructure</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Housing and Urban Development</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-09-20">
            <name>BULK COMMODITIES PORT</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2012-09-20T15:08:00" />
        <text id="201209200c89e7d1aa95412ca0000742">
          <timeStamp time="2012-09-20T15:08:00" />
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON (Elder—Minister for Transport and Infrastructure, Minister for Housing and Urban Development) (15:08):</by>  If I heard the question correctly, it was: why are we seeking funding for a bulk port facility when the Minister for Manufacturing has ruled out us building it ourselves.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="interjection">
        <name>Ms Chapman</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201209200c89e7d1aa95412ca0000743">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms Chapman:</by>  No, going into the ports business.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201209200c89e7d1aa95412ca0000744">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON:</by>  Going into the port business? We would like the commonwealth to spend commonwealth funds in South Australia on a port. I would have thought that would assist us, in not having to provide the funds ourselves. I am struggling with the import of the question here.</text>
        <text id="201209200c89e7d1aa95412ca0000745">Can I indicate to the member for Bragg that the commonwealth has, on occasions in the past, I believe in the interest of clearing bottlenecks, either made offers or has funded ports in other states. It is not my particular area of expertise, but I believe some funding was advanced for ports in Western Australia.</text>
        <text id="201209200c89e7d1aa95412ca0000746">We believe that there is a bright future for the mining industry in South Australia. We believe that there will be a need for a bulk commodities port that we do not have at present and we have been doing work with Flinders Ports around Port Bonython. We have met, and so has the Premier, a number of potential Chinese investors including those investors who already have a memorandum of understanding around—it is not Sheep Hill anymore, it is called Port Spencer—all very wise. The notion that we should not ask the commonwealth for funds to accelerate or enhance such a thing seemed very strange to me.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201209200c89e7d1aa95412ca0000747">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> Supplementary, member for Bragg.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>