<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2012-09-18" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2895" />
  <endPage num="2995" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Answers to Questions</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Modbury Hospital</name>
      <text id="201209180841e12b038c430390000307">
        <heading>MODBURY HOSPITAL</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="631" kind="question">
        <name>Mr HAMILTON-SMITH</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Waite</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-07-17" qonNum="109">
            <name>MODBURY HOSPITAL</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="201209180841e12b038c430390000308">109 <by role="member" id="631">Mr HAMILTON-SMITH (Waite)</by> (17 July 2012).  With respect to 2012-13 Budget Paper 4, vol. 3, p. 15—</text>
        <text id="201209180841e12b038c430390000309">Why was $22 million budgeted for the Modbury Hospital development in 2011-12, and only $1.378 million spent and what the reason for this delay?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Kaurna</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health and Ageing</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-07-17" qonNum="109">
            <name>MODBURY HOSPITAL</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="201209180841e12b038c430390000310">
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL (Kaurna—Minister for Health and Ageing, Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse, Minister for the Arts):</by>  I am advised:</text>
        <text id="201209180841e12b038c430390000311">In the 2011-12 State Budget Papers, the proposed expenditure for the Modbury Hospital Redevelopment project was stated as being $22 million. The total budget for this project is $46.378 million.</text>
        <text id="201209180841e12b038c430390000312">While it had been intended to commence construction work on this project during 2011–12, this did not eventuate because during the master planning process two options were identified for the delivery of the 36 bed rehabilitation unit and these needed to be fully investigated. In considering these options, a decision was taken late in 2011 to proceed with the construction of a new building rather than refurbishment of the existing tower building.</text>
        <text id="201209180841e12b038c430390000313">Once this decision had been made, concept development was undertaken to develop the project design in sufficient detail for consideration by the Government and the Public Works Committee before proceeding to construction. The final actual expenditure on the project during 2011-12 was $0.83 million.</text>
        <text id="201209180841e12b038c430390000314">As part of the 2012-13 State budget considerations, a decision was taken to deliver this project in two stages. The first stage being the redevelopment and expansion of the emergency department, which is due to be completed in December 2013. The second stage will be the construction of the new 36 bed rehabilitation building, which has been rescheduled to commence construction in 2016-17.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>