<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2012-09-06" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2821" />
  <endPage num="2896" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Answers to Questions</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Thinkers in Residence</name>
      <text id="201209062b377113b4414a69a0000478">
        <heading>THINKERS IN RESIDENCE</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1813" kind="question">
        <name>In reply to Mrs REDMOND</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Heysen</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-09-06">
            <name>THINKERS IN RESIDENCE</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="201209062b377113b4414a69a0000479">In reply to <by role="member" id="1813">Mrs REDMOND (Heysen—Leader of the Opposition)</by> (8 November 2011) (First Session).</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State Development</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-09-06">
            <name>THINKERS IN RESIDENCE</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="201209062b377113b4414a69a0000480">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier, Minister for State Development):</by>  I have been advised of the following:</text>
        <text id="201209062b377113b4414a69a0000481">In regard to Laura Lee, each resident Thinker is paid a negotiated fee for their residency, in agreed instalments, which is determined by a number of factors. These factors include the global status and reputation of the Thinker, the length and nature of the residency, the number of visits, and the agreed reporting mechanism. The total fee includes accommodation and travel allowances. In Laura Lee's case, the total fee included costs associated with her assistant.</text>
        <text id="201209062b377113b4414a69a0000482">The $39,900 paid to Laura Lee in 2010-11 consists of the final stipend payment of $15,000 for the residency and $24,900 for preliminary planning associated with the Integrated Design Commission (IDC) which emerged from the residency recommendations.</text>
        <text id="201209062b377113b4414a69a0000483">Payment of the $15,000 final stipend was previously reported as being in 2009-10, but was actually paid in 2010-11.</text>
        <page num="2858" />
        <text id="201209062b377113b4414a69a0000484">The $24,900 associated with the IDC was previously reported as being paid in 2009-10 however this invoice was caught up in end of year financial processes and was paid in 2010-11. This payment is additional to the residency, but is a direct outcome of the residency recommendations.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>