<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2012-07-10" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2319" />
  <endPage num="2384" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Disabled Students, Transport Arrangements</name>
      <text id="20120710d238b90ffa8b4887b0000564">
        <heading>DISABLED STUDENTS, TRANSPORT ARRANGEMENTS</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3124" kind="question">
        <name>Mr PISONI</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Unley</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-07-10">
            <name>DISABLED STUDENTS, TRANSPORT ARRANGEMENTS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2012-07-10T14:39:00" />
        <text id="20120710d238b90ffa8b4887b0000565">
          <timeStamp time="2012-07-10T14:39:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3124">Mr PISONI (Unley) (14:39):</by>  I have a supplementary question. Why wasn't this policy followed in the case of Kirsten Richards—this policy you say you have of consultation—and her two children with autism, who had their transport arrangements changed without warning?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120710d238b90ffa8b4887b0000566">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> I think the minister has answered that question. Minister.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3127" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. G. PORTOLESI</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Hartley</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Education and Child Development</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2012-07-10T14:39:00" />
        <text id="20120710d238b90ffa8b4887b0000567">
          <timeStamp time="2012-07-10T14:39:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3127">The Hon. G. PORTOLESI (Hartley—Minister for Education and Child Development) (14:39):</by>  I have absolutely answered that question. This is not—</text>
        <text id="20120710d238b90ffa8b4887b0000568">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120710d238b90ffa8b4887b0000569">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! Minister, do you wish to answer?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3127">
        <name>The Hon. G. PORTOLESI</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120710d238b90ffa8b4887b0000570">
          <by role="member" id="3127">The Hon. G. PORTOLESI:</by>  I have answered that question. What I will say is that this is not about consultation. This is a very different matter. The service has not changed. It is simply about ensuring that the notice given to families in the event that there is change is more adequate. That is supposed to—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3124" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Pisoni</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120710d238b90ffa8b4887b0000571">
          <by role="member" id="3124">Mr Pisoni:</by>  But why didn't it happen?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120710d238b90ffa8b4887b0000572">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3127">
        <name>The Hon. G. PORTOLESI</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120710d238b90ffa8b4887b0000573">
          <by role="member" id="3127">The Hon. G. PORTOLESI:</by>  Well, it did not occur in this case. The family—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3124" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Pisoni</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120710d238b90ffa8b4887b0000574">
          <by role="member" id="3124">Mr Pisoni:</by>  But why? The question is: why?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3127">
        <name>The Hon. G. PORTOLESI</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120710d238b90ffa8b4887b0000575">
          <by role="member" id="3127">The Hon. G. PORTOLESI:</by>  —had notice. The family did have some notice; however, they felt that that was inadequate because of the very close bond that I understand the young student had developed with this taxi driver, and that is fair enough. So the family did have some notice. They did not think that was adequate. I actually agree with them, and I have used this opportunity to say to my department, 'Look, we have to build in to our service delivery much more lengthy periods of notice.'</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3124" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Pisoni</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120710d238b90ffa8b4887b0000576">
          <by role="member" id="3124">Mr Pisoni:</by>  Were they noticed as per policy?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120710d238b90ffa8b4887b0000577">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> Order! Member for Unley.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>